Factors affecting de novo urinary retention after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
- PMID: 24465454
- PMCID: PMC3897383
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084938
Factors affecting de novo urinary retention after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate
Abstract
Objective: Patients can experience urinary retention (UR) after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) that requires bladder distension during the procedure. The aim of this retrospective study is to identify factors affecting the UR after HoLEP.
Materials and methods: 336 patients, which underwent HoLEP for a symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia between July 2008 and March 2012, were included in this study. Urethral catheters were routinely removed one or two days after surgery. UR was defined as the need for an indwelling catheter placement following a failure to void after catheter removal. Demographic and clinical parameters were compared between the UR (n = 37) and the non-urinary retention (non-UR; n = 299) groups.
Results: The mean age of patients was 68.3 (±6.5) years and the mean operative time was 75.3 (±37.4) min. Thirty seven patients (11.0%) experienced a postoperative UR. UR patients voided catheter free an average of 1.9 (±1.7) days after UR. With regard to the causes of UR, 24 (7.1%) and 13 (3.9%) patients experienced a blood clot-related UR and a non-clot related UR respectively. Using multivariate analysis (p<0.05), we found significant differences between the UR and the non-UR groups with regard to a morcellation efficiency (OR 0.701, 95% CI 0.498-0.988) and a bleeding-related complication, such as, a reoperation for bleeding (OR 0.039, 95% CI 0.004-0.383) or a transfusion (OR 0.144, 95% CI 0.027-0.877). Age, history of diabetes, prostate volume, pre-operative post-void residual, bladder contractility index, learning curve, and operative time were not significantly associated with the UR (p>0.05).
Conclusions: De novo UR after HoLEP was found to be self-limited and it was not related to learning curve, patient age, diabetes, or operative time. Efficient morcellation and careful control of bleeding, which reduces clot formation, decrease the risk of UR after HoLEP.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in large glands (40 to 200 grams).J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1270-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000086948.55973.00. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 14501739 Clinical Trial.
-
[En bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP EN BLOC): our experience].Urologiia. 2018 Jul;(3):83-87. Urologiia. 2018. PMID: 30035424 Russian.
-
Feasibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E845-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11290.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22702908
-
Expanded Criteria Same Day Catheter Removal After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.J Endourol. 2022 Jul;36(7):977-981. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0007. Epub 2022 Jun 21. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 35045752 Review.
-
Peri-operative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: experience in the first 280 patients, and a review of literature.BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06867.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5. BJU Int. 2007. PMID: 17419697 Review.
Cited by
-
A Modified Technique of Thulium Laser Enucleation for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Non-morcellator Approach.Front Surg. 2021 May 7;8:657869. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.657869. eCollection 2021. Front Surg. 2021. PMID: 34026814 Free PMC article.
-
Ambulatory surgery for Moses™ holmium laser enucleation of the prostate A prospective, real-practice study from a single center.Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Aug;17(8):E228-E235. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8229. Can Urol Assoc J. 2023. PMID: 37581561 Free PMC article.
-
The Learning Curves for Laser Application in Urology Procedures: Review of the Literature.J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Fall;11(Suppl 1):S8-S15. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.S2. Epub 2020 Dec 30. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 33995963 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk Factors for Transurethral Coagulation for Hemostasis During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.Int Neurourol J. 2022 Jun;26(2):153-160. doi: 10.5213/inj.2142414.207. Epub 2022 Jun 30. Int Neurourol J. 2022. PMID: 35793994 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of urinary retention after endoscopic prostate enucleation and its subsequent impact on surgical outcomes.World J Urol. 2024 May 9;42(1):305. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04918-1. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 38724829
References
-
- Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Malcolm AR, Fraundorfer MR (1995) Combination holmium and Nd:YAG laser ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience. J Endourol 9: 151–153. - PubMed
-
- Elzayat EA, Habib E, Elhilali MM (2005) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new “gold standard”. Urology 66: 108–113. - PubMed
-
- Hettiarachchi JA, Samadi AA, Konno S, Das AK (2002) Holmium laser enucleation for large (greater than 100 mL) prostate glands. Int J Urol 9: 233–236. - PubMed
-
- Suardi N, Gallina A, Salonia A, Briganti A, Deho F, et al. (2009) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and holmium laser ablation of the prostate: indications and outcome. Curr Opin Urol 19: 38–43. - PubMed
-
- Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, Suardi N, Briganti A, et al. (2004) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 172: 1926–1929. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical