Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):e85434.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085434. eCollection 2014.

Does competition work as a motivating factor in e-learning? A randomized controlled trial

Bjarne Skjødt Worm  1 , Steen Vigh Buch  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Does competition work as a motivating factor in e-learning? A randomized controlled trial

Bjarne Skjødt Worm et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Examinations today are often computerized and the primary motivation and curriculum is often based on the examinations. This study aims to test if competition widgets in e-learning quiz modules improve post-test and follow-up test results and self-evaluation. The secondary aim is to evaluate improvements during the training period comparing test-results and number of tests taken.

Methods: Two groups were randomly assigned to either a quiz-module with competition widgets or a module without. Pre-, post- and follow up test-results were recorded. Time used within the modules was measured and students reported time studying. Students were able to choose questions from former examinations in the quiz-module.

Results: Students from the competing group were significantly better at both post-and follow-up-test and had a significantly better overall learning efficiency than those from the non-competing group. They were also significantly better at guessing their post-test results.

Conclusion: Quiz modules with competition widgets motivate students to become more active during the module and stimulate better total efficiency. They also generate improved self-awareness regarding post-test-results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow sheet.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples from quiz module.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mean training-test results depending of number of quiz taken.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kim S, Song SM, Yoon YI (2011) Smart learning services based on smart cloud computing. Sensors (Basel) 11: 7835–50 doi:10.3390/s110807835 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Worm BS (2013) Learning from Simple EBooks, Online Cases or Classroom Teaching When Acquiring Complex Knowledge. A Randomized Controlled Trial in Respiratory Physiology and Pulmonology. PLoS ONE 8: e73336 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073336 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Worm BS, Jensen K (2013) Does peer learning or higher levels of e-learning improve learning abilities? A randomized controlled trial. Med Educ Online 18: 21877. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malone TW, Lepper MR (1987) Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow RE, Farr MJ, editors. Aptitude, learning, and instruction, Vol. 3: Conative and affective process analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 223–35.
    1. Rabinowitz HK, Babbott D, Bastacky S, Pascoe JM, Patel KK, et al. (2001) Innovative approaches to educating medical students for practice in a changing health care environment: the National UME-21 project. Acad Med 76: 587–97. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources