Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013;6(2):48-62.

Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now

Affiliations
Review

Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now

Errol R Norwitz et al. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013.

Abstract

Prenatal detection of chromosome abnormalities has been offered for more than 40 years, first by amniocentesis in the early 1970s and additionally by chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in the early 1980s. Given the well-recognized association between increasing maternal age and trisomy,1-3 the primary utilization of prenatal testing has been by older mothers. This has drastically reduced the incidence of aneuploid children born to older mothers.4 Although younger women have relatively low risks of conceiving a child with aneuploidy, the majority of pregnant women are in their late teens, 20s, and early 30s. As such, most viable aneuploid babies are born to these younger mothers.5 Invasive prenatal diagnosis (CVS and amniocentesis) is not a feasible option for all low-risk mothers, as these procedures carry a small but finite risk and would ultimately cause more miscarriages than they would detect aneuploidy. For this reason, a number of noninvasive tests have been developed-including first-trimester risk assessment at 11 to 14 weeks, maternal serum analyte (quad) screening at 15 to 20 weeks, and sonographic fetal structural survey at 18 to 22 weeks-all of which are designed to give a woman an adjusted (more accurate) estimate of having an aneuploid fetus using as baseline her a priori age-related risk. Ultrasound and maternal serum analysis are considered screening procedures and both require follow up by CVS or amniocentesis in screen-positive cases for a definitive diagnosis of a chromosome abnormality in the fetus. The ability to isolate fetal cells and fetal DNA from maternal blood during pregnancy has opened up exciting opportunities for improved noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT). Direct analysis of fetal cells from maternal circulation has been challenging given the scarcity of fetal cells in maternal blood (1:10,000-1:1,000,000) and the focus has shifted to the analysis of cell-free fetal DNA, which is found at a concentration almost 25 times higher than that available from nucleated blood cells extracted from a similar volume of whole maternal blood. There have now been numerous reports on the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for NIPT for chromosomal aneuploidies-especially trisomy (an extra copy of a chromosome) or monosomy (a missing chromosome)-and a number of commercial products are already being marketed for this indication. This article reviews the various techniques being used to analyze cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation for the prenatal detection of chromosome abnormalities and the evidence in support of each. A number of areas of ongoing controversy are addressed, including the timing of maternal blood sampling, the need for genetic counseling, and the use of confirmatory invasive testing. Future applications for this technology are also reviewed.

Keywords: Cell-free fetal DNA; Noninvasive prenatal testing; Prenatal diagnosis; Trisomy 21.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Massively parallel shotgun sequencing for the noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy. (A) Fetal DNA (green) circulates in the maternal plasma as a minor population among a high background of maternal DNA (blue). A sample of maternal plasma is obtained. Short fragments of cell-free DNA are then sequenced. (B) The chromosomal origin of each sequence is identified by mapping the reads to the human reference genome. (C) The number of unique sequences mapped to each chromosome is then counted and the number of sequences for the chromosomes of interest is determined in subsequent analysis. Aneuploidy is detected by various statistical techniques based on the number of reads representing the chromosome of interest compared with the other chromosomes. The blue and green circles represent the reads mapped to each chromosome from maternal and fetal DNA fractions, respectively. However, there is no way to distinguish the origin of the individual reads; the only difference is in the total number of reads that are detected. If the reads exceed that expected, the fetus is trisomic for that chromosome (shown for chr 21 above).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hassold T, Hunt PA, Sherman S. Trisomy in humans: incidence, origin and etiology. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993;3:398–403. - PubMed
    1. Penrose LS. The relative aetiological importance of birth order and maternal age in mongolism. Proc Roy Soc Lond [Biol] 1934;115:431–450.
    1. Sherman SL, Petersen MB, Freeman SB, et al. Nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in maternal meiosis I: evidence for a maternal age-dependent mechanism involving reduced recombination. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:1529–1535. - PubMed
    1. Hook EB. Chromosome abnormalities: prevalence, risks and recurrence. In: Brock DJH, Rodeck CH, Ferguson-Smith MA, editors. Prenatal Diagnosis and Screening. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. pp. 351–392.
    1. Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 478.

LinkOut - more resources