Results of the prospective multicenter Japanese bridge to transplant study with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device
- PMID: 24469114
- DOI: 10.1007/s10047-013-0752-y
Results of the prospective multicenter Japanese bridge to transplant study with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device
Abstract
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are becoming the standard of care for patients with refractory end-stage heart failure. We present the outcomes of patients enrolled in a prospective multicenter clinical study in Japan using the HeartMate II continuous-flow LVAD for bridge to transplantation. The study evaluated 6 inotrope-dependent heart failure patients failing on medical management (3 males and 3 females, age 44.7 ± 15.8 years, BSA 1.58 ± 0.17 m(2)) implanted with the HMII LVAD at 5 Japanese centers. Functional status, adverse events and outcomes were determined for the first 6 months with follow-up at 2 years. After implant, functional improvement was evident in 6-min walk distance which increased from 268 ± 92 m at baseline to 399 ± 105 m at 6 months, and 100% of patients were in NYHA class I or II at 6 months compared to 0% at baseline. Adverse events included localized non-device-related infection (4/6), arrhythmias (3/6) and percutaneous lead infection (1/6). There were no re-thoracotomies for bleeding and no strokes or pump replacements. All patients were alive at 6 months and all were transplanted after 1.96-3.58 years of LVAD support. The results in Japan of the HMII LVAD for BTT are consistent with results from the US pivotal clinical trial. The expanded use of this technology to Japanese heart failure patients is appropriate.
Similar articles
-
Association of Clinical Outcomes With Left Ventricular Assist Device Use by Bridge to Transplant or Destination Therapy Intent: The Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):411-419. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5323. JAMA Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31939996 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010. PMID: 20447659
-
Use of left ventricular assist device (HeartMate II): a Singapore experience.Artif Organs. 2014 Jul;38(7):543-8. doi: 10.1111/aor.12247. Epub 2014 Jan 7. Artif Organs. 2014. PMID: 24392937
-
Aspirin and left ventricular assist devices: rationale and design for the international randomized, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority ARIES HM3 trial.Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jul;23(7):1226-1237. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2275. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021. PMID: 34142415 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding Left Ventricular Assist Devices.Blood Purif. 2018;46(4):292-300. doi: 10.1159/000491872. Epub 2018 Jul 26. Blood Purif. 2018. PMID: 30048974 Review.
Cited by
-
Differences in the prognoses of patients referred to an advanced heart failure center from hospitals with different bed volumes.Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78162-z. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 33273668 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Adult Patients with Small Body Size Supported with a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device.ASAIO J. 2016 Nov/Dec;62(6):646-651. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000430. ASAIO J. 2016. PMID: 27556150 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical