Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;39(2):43-54.
doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.2.43. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

Antimicrobial surfaces for craniofacial implants: state of the art

Affiliations
Review

Antimicrobial surfaces for craniofacial implants: state of the art

Lisa Actis et al. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

In an attempt to regain function and aesthetics in the craniofacial region, different biomaterials, including titanium, hydroxyapatite, biodegradable polymers and composites, have been widely used as a result of the loss of craniofacial bone. Although these materials presented favorable success rates, osseointegration and antibacterial properties are often hard to achieve. Although bone-implant interactions are highly dependent on the implant's surface characteristics, infections following traumatic craniofacial injuries are common. As such, poor osseointegration and infections are two of the many causes of implant failure. Further, as increasingly complex dental repairs are attempted, the likelihood of infection in these implants has also been on the rise. For these reasons, the treatment of craniofacial bone defects and dental repairs for long-term success remains a challenge. Various approaches to reduce the rate of infection and improve osseointegration have been investigated. Furthermore, recent and planned tissue engineering developments are aimed at improving the implants' physical and biological properties by improving their surfaces in order to develop craniofacial bone substitutes that will restore, maintain and improve tissue function. In this review, the commonly used biomaterials for craniofacial bone restoration and dental repair, as well as surface modification techniques, antibacterial surfaces and coatings are discussed.

Keywords: Antimicrobial agents; Bone regeneration; Dental implants; Osseointegration; Surface-coated materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abu-Serriah MM, McGowan DA, Moos KF, Bagg J. Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:452–458. - PubMed
    1. Bencharit S. Challenges and prospective applications of extra-oral implants for maxilloracial rehabilitation. Anaplastology. 2012;1:e103.
    1. Wan DC, Nacamuli RP, Longaker MT. Craniofacial bone tissue engineering. Dent Clin North Am. 2006;50:175–190. - PubMed
    1. Dumas JE, BrownBaer PB, Prieto EM, Guda T, Hale RG, Wenke JC, et al. Injectable reactive biocomposites for bone healing in critical-size rabbit calvarial defects. Biomed Mater. 2012;7:024112. - PubMed
    1. Kretlow JD. Biomaterial-based strategies for craniofacial tissue engineering [PhD thesis] Houston: Department of Bioengineering, Rice University; 2010. p. 416.