Antimicrobial surfaces for craniofacial implants: state of the art
- PMID: 24471018
- PMCID: PMC3858148
- DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.2.43
Antimicrobial surfaces for craniofacial implants: state of the art
Abstract
In an attempt to regain function and aesthetics in the craniofacial region, different biomaterials, including titanium, hydroxyapatite, biodegradable polymers and composites, have been widely used as a result of the loss of craniofacial bone. Although these materials presented favorable success rates, osseointegration and antibacterial properties are often hard to achieve. Although bone-implant interactions are highly dependent on the implant's surface characteristics, infections following traumatic craniofacial injuries are common. As such, poor osseointegration and infections are two of the many causes of implant failure. Further, as increasingly complex dental repairs are attempted, the likelihood of infection in these implants has also been on the rise. For these reasons, the treatment of craniofacial bone defects and dental repairs for long-term success remains a challenge. Various approaches to reduce the rate of infection and improve osseointegration have been investigated. Furthermore, recent and planned tissue engineering developments are aimed at improving the implants' physical and biological properties by improving their surfaces in order to develop craniofacial bone substitutes that will restore, maintain and improve tissue function. In this review, the commonly used biomaterials for craniofacial bone restoration and dental repair, as well as surface modification techniques, antibacterial surfaces and coatings are discussed.
Keywords: Antimicrobial agents; Bone regeneration; Dental implants; Osseointegration; Surface-coated materials.
Similar articles
-
Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration.Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):844-54. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025. Epub 2006 Aug 14. Dent Mater. 2007. PMID: 16904738 Review.
-
Effect of Strontium-Coated Titanium Implants on Osseointegration in Animal Models: A Literature Systematic Review.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Jun;34(34):1389-1396. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7827. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019. PMID: 31711080
-
Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications.Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 1;83:37-54. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.036. Epub 2018 Oct 26. Acta Biomater. 2019. PMID: 30541702 Review.
-
Research on implants and osseointegration.Periodontol 2000. 2019 Feb;79(1):178-189. doi: 10.1111/prd.12254. Periodontol 2000. 2019. PMID: 30892769 Review.
-
A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.J Periodontol. 1999 Dec;70(12):1523-39. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.12.1523. J Periodontol. 1999. PMID: 10632528
Cited by
-
A decomposable silica-based antibacterial coating for percutaneous titanium implant.Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Jan 6;12:371-379. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S123622. eCollection 2017. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017. PMID: 28123297 Free PMC article.
-
Titanium Implant Osseointegration Problems with Alternate Solutions Using Epoxy/Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composite.Metals (Basel). 2014 Dec;4(4):549-569. doi: 10.3390/met4040549. Metals (Basel). 2014. PMID: 25635227 Free PMC article.
-
Zoledronic Acid Implant Coating Results in Local Medullary Bone Growth.Mol Pharm. 2022 Dec 5;19(12):4654-4664. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00644. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Mol Pharm. 2022. PMID: 36378992 Free PMC article.
-
Increased Mesenchymal Stem Cell Response and Decreased Staphylococcus aureus Adhesion on Titania Nanotubes without Pharmaceuticals.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:172898. doi: 10.1155/2015/172898. Epub 2015 Nov 10. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26640782 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Incorporating Antimicrobials into Implant Surfaces.J Dent Res. 2018 Jan;97(1):14-22. doi: 10.1177/0022034517731768. Epub 2017 Sep 18. J Dent Res. 2018. PMID: 28922615 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abu-Serriah MM, McGowan DA, Moos KF, Bagg J. Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:452–458. - PubMed
-
- Bencharit S. Challenges and prospective applications of extra-oral implants for maxilloracial rehabilitation. Anaplastology. 2012;1:e103.
-
- Wan DC, Nacamuli RP, Longaker MT. Craniofacial bone tissue engineering. Dent Clin North Am. 2006;50:175–190. - PubMed
-
- Dumas JE, BrownBaer PB, Prieto EM, Guda T, Hale RG, Wenke JC, et al. Injectable reactive biocomposites for bone healing in critical-size rabbit calvarial defects. Biomed Mater. 2012;7:024112. - PubMed
-
- Kretlow JD. Biomaterial-based strategies for craniofacial tissue engineering [PhD thesis] Houston: Department of Bioengineering, Rice University; 2010. p. 416.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials