Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;27(3):431-44.
doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt283. Epub 2014 Jan 28.

Gene-education interactions identify novel blood pressure loci in the Framingham Heart Study

Affiliations

Gene-education interactions identify novel blood pressure loci in the Framingham Heart Study

Jacob Basson et al. Am J Hypertens. 2014 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Am J Hypertens. 2014 Nov;27(11):1432

Abstract

Background: Blood pressure (BP) variability has a genetic component, most of which has yet to be attributed to specific variants. One promising strategy for gene discovery is analysis of interactions between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and BP-related factors, including age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Educational attainment, a marker for socioeconomic status, has effects on both BP and BMI.

Methods: We investigated SNP-education interaction effects on BP in genome-wide data on 3,836 subjects in families from the Framingham Heart Study. The ABEL suite was used to adjust for age, sex, BMI, medication use, and kinship and to perform 1 degree-of-freedrom (df) and 2 df SNP-education interaction tests.

Results: An SNP in PTN was associated with increased systolic BP (5.4mm Hg per minor allele) in those without a bachelor's degree but decreased systolic BP (1.6mm Hg per allele) in those with a bachelor's degree (2 df; P = 2.08 × 10(-8)). An SNP in TOX2 was associated with increased diastolic BP (DBP; 4.1mm Hg per minor allele) in those with no more educational attainment than high school but decreased DBP in those with education past high school (-0.7; 1 df; P = 3.74 × 10(-8)). Three suggestive associations were also found: in MYO16 (pulse pressure: 2 df; P = 2.89 × 10(-7)), in HAS2 (DBP: 1 df; P = 1.41 × 10(-7)), and in DLEU2 (DBP: 2 df; P = 1.93 × 10(-7)). All 5 genes are related to BP, including roles in vasodilation and angiogenesis for PTN and TOX2.

Conclusions: PTN and TOX2 are associated with BP. Analyzing SNP-education interactions may detect novel associations. Education may be a surrogate for unmeasured exposures and behaviors modifying SNP effects on BP.

Keywords: GWAS; blood pressure; educational attainment; gene–education interaction; hypertension; interaction..

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
QQ plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) QQ plot for joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). (b) QQ plot for 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). (c) QQ plot for 1 df test of SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). (d) QQ plot for 2 df test of SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interactions for DBP.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
QQ plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) QQ plot for joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). (b) QQ plot for 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). (c) QQ plot for 1 df test of SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). (d) QQ plot for 2 df test of SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interactions for DBP.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
QQ plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) QQ plot for joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). (b) QQ plot for 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). (c) QQ plot for 1 df test of SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). (d) QQ plot for 2 df test of SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interactions for DBP.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
QQ plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) QQ plot for joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). (b) QQ plot for 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). (c) QQ plot for 1 df test of SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). (d) QQ plot for 2 df test of SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interactions for DBP.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Manhattan plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) Manhattan plot of the joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of the singlue nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 7 (PTN). (b) Manhattan plot of the 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 20 (TOX2), and a suggestive locus is located on chromosome 8 (HAS2). (c) Manhattan plot of joint 1 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (MYO16). (d) Manhattan plot of joint 2 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interaction for DBP. The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (DLEU2).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Manhattan plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) Manhattan plot of the joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of the singlue nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 7 (PTN). (b) Manhattan plot of the 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 20 (TOX2), and a suggestive locus is located on chromosome 8 (HAS2). (c) Manhattan plot of joint 1 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (MYO16). (d) Manhattan plot of joint 2 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interaction for DBP. The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (DLEU2).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Manhattan plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) Manhattan plot of the joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of the singlue nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 7 (PTN). (b) Manhattan plot of the 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 20 (TOX2), and a suggestive locus is located on chromosome 8 (HAS2). (c) Manhattan plot of joint 1 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (MYO16). (d) Manhattan plot of joint 2 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interaction for DBP. The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (DLEU2).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Manhattan plots for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype, education covariable, and interaction test. (a) Manhattan plot of the joint 2 degrees-of-freedom (df) test of the singlue nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) main effect and interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA) for systolic blood pressure (SBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 7 (PTN). (b) Manhattan plot of the 1 df test of interaction of SNP with a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+) for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. One novel locus reaching significance is located on chromosome 20 (TOX2), and a suggestive locus is located on chromosome 8 (HAS2). (c) Manhattan plot of joint 1 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_HS+ interaction for pulse pressure (PP). The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (MYO16). (d) Manhattan plot of joint 2 df test of the SNP main effect and SNP-Comp_BA interaction for DBP. The –log10(P value) is plotted by genomic position. A suggestive locus is located on chromosome 13 (DLEU2).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean blood pressure by minor allele count (MAC) for selected combinations of blood pressure phenotype and SNP. (a) Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) by PTN genotype and a dichotomous variable distinguishing those without a bachelor’s degree from those with a bachelor’s degree (Comp_BA). (b) Mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by TOX2 genotype and a dichotomous variable distinguishing those with no more than high school education from those with at least some college (Comp_HS+).

References

    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, Aryee M, Atkinson C, Bacchus LJ, Bahalim AN, Balakrishnan K, Balmes J, Barker-Collo S, Baxter A, Bell ML, Blore JD, Blyth F, Bonner C, Borges G, Bourne R, Boussinesq M, Brauer M, Brooks P, Bruce NG, Brunekreef B, Bryan-Hancock C, Bucello C, Buchbinder R, Bull F, Burnett RT, Byers TE, Calabria B, Carapetis J, Carnahan E, Chafe Z, Charlson F, Chen H, Chen JS, Cheng AT, Child JC, Cohen A, Colson KE, Cowie BC, Darby S, Darling S, Davis A, Degenhardt L, Dentener F, Des Jarlais DC, Devries K, Dherani M, Ding EL, Dorsey ER, Driscoll T, Edmond K, Ali SE, Engell RE, Erwin PJ, Fahimi S, Falder G, Farzadfar F, Ferrari A, Finucane MM, Flaxman S, Fowkes FG, Freedman G, Freeman MK, Gakidou E, Ghosh S, Giovannucci E, Gmel G, Graham K, Grainger R, Grant B, Gunnell D, Gutierrez HR, Hall W, Hoek HW, Hogan A, Hosgood HD, 3rd, Hoy D, Hu H, Hubbell BJ, Hutchings SJ, Ibeanusi SE, Jacklyn GL, Jasrasaria R, Jonas JB, Kan H, Kanis JA, Kassebaum N, Kawakami N, Khang YH, Khatibzadeh S, Khoo JP, Kok C, Laden F, Lalloo R, Lan Q, Lathlean T, Leasher JL, Leigh J, Li Y, Lin JK, Lipshultz SE, London S, Lozano R, Lu Y, Mak J, Malekzadeh R, Mallinger L, Marcenes W, March L, Marks R, Martin R, McGale P, McGrath J, Mehta S, Mensah GA, Merriman TR, Micha R, Michaud C, Mishra V, Mohd Hanafiah K, Mokdad AA, Morawska L, Mozaffarian D, Murphy T, Naghavi M, Neal B, Nelson PK, Nolla JM, Norman R, Olives C, Omer SB, Orchard J, Osborne R, Ostro B, Page A, Pandey KD, Parry CD, Passmore E, Patra J, Pearce N, Pelizzari PM, Petzold M, Phillips MR, Pope D, Pope CA, 3rd, Powles J, Rao M, Razavi H, Rehfuess EA, Rehm JT, Ritz B, Rivara FP, Roberts T, Robinson C, Rodriguez-Portales JA, Romieu I, Room R, Rosenfeld LC, Roy A, Rushton L, Salomon JA, Sampson U, Sanchez-Riera L, Sanman E, Sapkota A, Seedat S, Shi P, Shield K, Shivakoti R, Singh GM, Sleet DA, Smith E, Smith KR, Stapelberg NJ, Steenland K, Stockl H, Stovner LJ, Straif K, Straney L, Thurston GD, Tran JH, Van Dingenen R, van Donkelaar A, Veerman JL, Vijayakumar L, Weintraub R, Weissman MM, White RA, Whiteford H, Wiersma ST, Wilkinson JD, Williams HC, Williams W, Wilson N, Woolf AD, Yip P, Zielinski JM, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Ezzati M, AlMazroa MA, Memish ZA. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380:2224–2260 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ehret GB. Genome-wide association studies: contribution of genomics to understanding blood pressure and essential hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep 2010; 12:17–25 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TF, McCarroll SA, Visscher PM. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009; 461:747–753 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ji W, Foo JN, O’Roak BJ, Zhao H, Larson MG, Simon DB, Newton-Cheh C, State MW, Levy D, Lifton RP. Rare independent mutations in renal salt handling genes contribute to blood pressure variation. Nat Genet 2008; 40:592–599 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Defago MD, Gu D, Hixson JE, Shimmin LC, Rice TK, Gu CC, Jaquish CE, Liu DP, He J, Kelly TN. Common genetic variants in the endothelial system predict blood pressure response to sodium intake: the GenSalt study. Am J Hypertens 2013; 26:643–656 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms