Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;21(5):1732-8.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3494-z. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

A systematic review of morbidity associated with autologous breast reconstruction before and after exposure to radiotherapy: are current practices ideal?

Affiliations

A systematic review of morbidity associated with autologous breast reconstruction before and after exposure to radiotherapy: are current practices ideal?

Brian P Kelley et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The specific aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess outcomes data on complications and aesthetic results associated with autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction performed before or after chest wall irradiation.

Methods: Studies from a PubMed search that met predetermined inclusion criteria were identified. Complications of interest included partial or total flap loss, fat necrosis, thrombosis, infection, seroma, hematoma, delayed wound healing, and flap fibrosis/contracture. Pooled complication rates were calculated.

Results: A total of 20 articles were included in the study for autologous reconstruction. These primary articles were selected after screening 897 publications, with six studies presenting data on pre-reconstruction radiation, nine studies presenting data on post-reconstruction radiation, and five studies presenting data on both patient groups. Comparison of pooled complication rates between flaps irradiated before or after reconstruction were statistically similar, including total flap loss (1 vs. 4 %), wound healing complications (10 vs. 14 %), infection (4 vs. 6 %), hematoma (2 vs. 1 %), seroma (4 vs. 4 %), and fat necrosis (10 vs. 13 %). The pooled rate of flap contracture and fibrosis was 27 % in flap reconstructions exposed to radiotherapy. Statistical evaluation of aesthetic outcomes was impossible as a result of variability in assessment and reporting methods.

Conclusions: Review of the current literature suggests similar rates of complications and success rates in autologous breast reconstruction patients exposed to pre- or post-reconstruction radiation. Immediate autologous reconstruction should be considered as a viable option even in patients who are likely to require postmastectomy radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Attrition diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest Plot of Wound Healing Complication Rates. Diamonds represent the overall summary estimate

References

    1. Meretoja TJ, von Smitten KA, Leidenius MH, Svarvar C, Heikkila PS, Jahkola TA. Local recurrence of stage 1 and 2 breast cancer after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in a 15-year series. European journal of surgical oncology: the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2007;33:1142–1145. - PubMed
    1. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. The New England journal of medicine. 1997;337:949–955. - PubMed
    1. Chevray PM. Timing of breast reconstruction: immediate versus delayed. Cancer journal. 2008;14:223–229. - PubMed
    1. Foster RD, Hansen SL, Esserman LJ, et al. Safety of immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced disease. Archives of surgery. 2005;140:196–198. discussion 199-200. - PubMed
    1. Rogers NE, Allen RJ. Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2002;109:1919–1924. discussion 1925-1916. - PubMed

Publication types