Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 28;2014(1):CD009685.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009685.pub2.

Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours

Affiliations

Image guided surgery for the resection of brain tumours

Damiano Giuseppe Barone et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Extent of resection is believed to be a key prognostic factor in neuro-oncology. Image guided surgery uses a variety of tools or technologies to help achieve this goal. It is not clear whether any of these, sometimes very expensive, tools (or their combination) should be recommended as part of standard care for patient with brain tumours. We set out to determine if image guided surgery offers any advantage in terms of extent of resection over surgery without any image guidance and if any one tool or technology was more effective.

Objectives: To compare image guided surgery with surgery either not using any image guidance or to compare surgery using two different forms of image guidance. The primary outcome criteria was extent of resection and adverse events. Other outcome criteria were overall survival; progression free survival; and quality of life (QoL).

Search methods: The following databases were searched, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 1, 2013), MEDLINE (1948 to March, week 10, 2013) and EMBASE (1970 to 2013, week 10). Reference lists of all identified studies were searched. Two journals, the Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Neuro-oncology, were handsearched from 1991 to 2013, including all conference abstracts. Neuro-oncologists, trial authors and manufacturers were contacted regarding ongoing and unpublished trials.

Selection criteria: Study participants included patients of all ages with a presumed new or recurrent brain tumour (any location or histology) from clinical examination and imaging (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or both). Image guidance interventions included intra-operative MRI (iMRI); fluorescence guided surgery; neuronavigation including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); and ultrasonography. Included studies had to be randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with comparisons made either with patients having surgery without the image guidance tool in question or with another type of image guidance tool. Subgroups were to include high grade glioma; low grade glioma; brain metastasis; skull base meningiomas; and sellar or parasellar tumours.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed the search results for relevance, undertook critical appraisal according to known guidelines, and extracted data using a pre-specified pro forma.

Main results: Four RCTs were identified, each using a different image guided technique: 1. iMRI (58 patients), 2. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) fluorescence guided surgery (322 patients), 3. neuronavigation (45 patients) and 4. DTI-neuronavigation (238 patients). Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to differences in the tumours included (eloquent versus non-eloquent locations) and variations in the image guidance tools used in the control arms (usually selective utilisation of neuronavigation). There were significant concerns regarding risk of bias in all the included studies, especially for the study using DTI-neuronavigation. All studies included patients with high grade glioma, with one study also including patients with low grade glioma. The extent of resection was increased with iMRI (risk ratio (RR) (incomplete resection) 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.96, low quality evidence), 5-ALA (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.71) and DTI-neuronavigation (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.63, very low quality evidence). Insufficient data were available to evaluate the effects of neuronavigation on extent of resection. Reporting of adverse events was incomplete, with a suggestion of significant reporting bias. Overall, reported events were low in most studies, but there was concern that surgical resection using 5-ALA may lead to more frequent early neurological deficits. There was no clear evidence of improvement in overall survival (OS) with 5-ALA (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07) or DTI-neuronavigation (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.00) in patients with high grade glioma. Progression-free survival (PFS) data were not available in the appropriate format for analysis.Data for quality of life (QoL) were only available for one study and suffered from significant attrition bias.

Authors' conclusions: There is low to very low quality evidence (according to GRADE criteria) that image guided surgery using iMRI, 5-ALA or DTI-neuronavigation increases the proportion of patients with high grade glioma that have a complete tumour resection on post-operative MRI. There is a theoretical concern that maximising the extent of resection may lead to more frequent adverse events but this was poorly reported in the included studies. Effects of image guided surgery on survival and QoL are unclear. Further research, including studies of ultrasound guided surgery, is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Image guided surgery versus control, outcome: 1.1 Incomplete resection (high grade glioma).
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Image guided surgery versus control, Outcome 1 Incomplete resection (HGG).

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Senft 2011 {published data only}
    1. Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Gasser T, Seifert V. Intra‐operative MRI‐Guided vs. conventional microsurgical brain tumor resection ‐ results of a prospective randomized trial. Journal of Neurosurgery 2011;115:Abstract number 602.
    1. Senft C, Bink A, Franz K, Vatter H, Gasser T, Seifert V. Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncology 2011;12:997‐1003. - PubMed
    1. Senft C, Bink A, Heckelmann M, Gasser T, Seifert V. Glioma extent of resection and ultra‐low‐field ioMRI: interim analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum 2011;109:49‐53. - PubMed
Stummer 2006 {published data only}
    1. Pichelmeier U, Bink A, Schackert G, Stummer W, ALA Glioma Study Group. Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: An RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients. Neuro‐oncology 2008;10(6):1025‐34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stummer W, Pichelmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zenella F, Reulen H‐J, ALA‐Glioma Study Group*. Fluorescence‐guided surgery with 5‐aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncology 2006;7:392‐401. - PubMed
    1. Stummer W, Reulen H‐J, Meinel T, Pichelmeier U, Schumacher W, Tonn J‐C, et al. ALA‐Glioma Study Group*. Extent of resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: identification of and adjustment for bias. Neurosurgery 2008;62:564‐76. - PubMed
    1. Stummer W, Tonn J‐C, Mehdorn HM, Nestler U, Franz K, Goetz C, Bink A, Pichlmeier U, ALA‐Glioma study group*. Counterbalancing risks and gains from extended resections in malignant glioma surgery: a supplemental analysis from the randomized 5‐aminolevulinic acid glioma resection study. Journal of Neurosurgery 2011;114(3):613‐23. - PubMed
Willems 2006 {published data only}
    1. Willems PW, Taphoorn MJ, Burger H, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA. Effectiveness of neuronavigation in resecting solitary intracerebral contrast‐enhancing tumors: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Neurosurgery 2006;104:360‐8. - PubMed
Wu 2007 {published data only}
    1. Wu JS, Zhou LF, Tang WJ, Mao Y, Hu J, Song YY, et al. Clinical evaluation and follow‐up outcome of diffusion tensor imaging‐based functional neuronavigation: a prospective, controlled study in patients with gliomas involving pyramidal tracts. Neurosurgery 2007 Nov;61(5):935‐49. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bergsneider 2005 {published data only}
    1. Bergsneider M, et al. Mahaley Clinical Research Award: extent of glioma resection using low‐field (0.2 T) versus high‐field (1.5 T) intraoperative MRI and image‐guided frameless neuronavigation. Clinical Neurosurgery 2005;52:389‐99. - PubMed
Eljamel 2008 {published data only}
    1. Eljamel M, Goodman C, Moseley H. ALA and Photofrin® Fluorescence guided resection and repetitive PDT in glioblastoma multiforme: a single centre Phase III randomised controlled trial. Lasers in Medical Science 2008;23(4):361‐7. - PubMed
Koc 2008 {published data only}
    1. Koc K, et al. Fluorescein sodium‐guided surgery in glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective evaluation. British Journal of Neurosurgery 2008;22(1):99‐103. - PubMed
Rhode 2011 {published data only}
    1. Rohde V, Coenen VA. Intraoperative 3‐Dimensional Ultrasound for Resection Control During Brain Tumour Removal: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Randomized Study. In: Pamir MN, V. Seifert V, Kiris T editor(s). Intraoperative Imaging. Springer Vienna, 2011:187‐90. - PubMed
Wirtz 2000 {published data only}
    1. Wirtz CR, et al. The benefit of neuronavigation for neurosurgery analyzed by its impact on glioblastoma surgery. Neurological Research 2000;22(4):354‐60. - PubMed
Wu 2003 {published data only}
    1. Wu JS, et al. Role of diffusion tensor imaging in neuronavigation surgery of brain tumors involving pyramidal tracts. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2003;41(9):662‐6. - PubMed
Wu 2004 {published data only}
    1. Wu JS, et al. Integrating functional magnetic resonance imaging in neuronavigation surgery of brain tumors involving motor cortex. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2004;84(8):632‐6. - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

NCT00752323 {published data only}
    1. Sloan A. Imaging procedure using ALA in finding residual tumor in grade IV malignant astrocytoma. ClinicalTrials.gov 2008.
NCT00943007 {published data only}
    1. Kubben PL. Comparison of Standard Neuronavigation With Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the Neurosurgical Treatment of Malignant Brain Tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov February 2010.
NCT00977327 {published data only}
    1. Kanner A. Comparison of Neuro‐navigational Systems for Resection‐Control of Brain Tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov August 2009.
NCT01479686 {published data only}
    1. Zhou L‐F, Mao Y, Wu J‐S. iMRI Guided Resection in Cerebral Glioma Surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov November 2011.
NCT01502280 (BALANCE) {published data only}
    1. Honea N. Fluorescence‐guided Surgery for Low‐ and High‐grade Gliomas. ClinicalTrials.gov December 2011.
NCT01798771 {published data only}
    1. Senft C. Intraoperative MRI and 5‐ALA Guidance to Improve the Extent of Resection in Brain Tumor Surgery (IMAGER). ClinicalTrials.gov February 2013.

Additional references

Black 1997
    1. Black PM, Moriarty T, Alexander E 3rd, Stieg P, Woodard EJ, Gleason PL, et al. Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery 1997;41(4):831‐42. - PubMed
CRD 2008
    1. Centre for Reviews and Dissemintation. Systematic Reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: York Publishing Services Limited. www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd 2008.
Deeks 2001
    1. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Systematic Review in HealthCare: Meta‐analysis in Context. In: Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG editor(s). Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta‐analysis. 2nd Edition. London: BMJ Publication Group, 2001.
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7:177–88. - PubMed
Fowkes 1991
    1. Fowkes FGR, Fulton PM. Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines. BMJ 1991;302:1136–40. - PMC - PubMed
GNOSIS 2007
    1. Chang S, Vogelbaum M, Lang FF, Haines S, Kunwar S, Chiocca EA, et al. GNOSIS: guidelines for neuro‐oncology: standards for investigational studies ‐ reporting of surgically based therapeutic clinical trials. Journal of Neuro‐Oncology 2007;82:211‐20. - PubMed
Hart 2011
    1. Hart MG, Grant R, Metcalfe SE. Biopsy versus resection for high grade glioma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002034] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Hensen 2008
    1. Hensen JW, Ulmer S, Harris GJ. Brain tumor imaging in clinical trials. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2008;24(3):419‐24. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2009
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Juni 2001
    1. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:42–6. - PMC - PubMed
Karnofsky 1948
    1. Karnofksy DA. The use of nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer 1948;1:634–56.
Loius 2007
    1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system . Acta Neuropathologica 2007 Aug;114(2):97‐109. - PMC - PubMed
Mauer 2008
    1. Mauer ME, Bottomley A, Taphoorn MJB. Evaluating health‐ related quality of life and symptom burden in brain tumour patients: instruments for use in clinical trials and clinical practice. Current Opinion in Neurology 2008;21:741–53. - PubMed
MedDRA 2008
    1. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Authorities (MedDRA). http:// www.meddramsso.com/MSSOWeb/index.htm 2008.
Miwa 2004
    1. Miwa K, Shinoda J, Yano H, Okumura A, Iwama T, Nakashima T, Sakai N. Discrepancy between lesion distributions on methionine PET and MR images in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: insight from a PET and MR fusion image study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2004;75:1457‐62. - PMC - PubMed
NICE 2006
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Improving outcomes for people with brain and other CNS tumours ‐ evidence review. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10905/28965/28965.pdf.
NIH Stoke Scale
    1. NIH Stroke Scale. National Institute for Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). http://www.ninds.nih.gov/doctors/NIH_Stroke_Scale.pdf .
Ohgaki 2009
    1. Ohgaki H. Epidemiology of brain tumors. Methods in Molecular Biology 2009;472:323‐42. - PubMed
Parmar 1998
    1. Parmar MKB, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta‐analyses of the published literature of endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17:2815–34. - PubMed
Pichlmeier 2008
    1. Pichelmeier U, Bink A, Schackert G, Stummer W, ALA Glioma Study Group. Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: an RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients.. Neuro‐oncology 2008;10:1025‐34. - PMC - PubMed
RANO 2010
    1. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro‐oncology working group. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010;28(11):1963‐72. - PubMed
Regula 1995
    1. Regula J, MacRobert AJ, Gorchein A, Buonaccorsi GA, Thorpe SM, Spencer GM, et al. Photosensitisation and photodynamic therapy of oesophageal, duodenal, and colorectal tumours using 5 aminolaevulinic acid induced protoporphyrin IX—a pilot study. Gut 1995;36:67–75. - PMC - PubMed
Sanai 2009
    1. Sanai N, Berger MS. Operative techniques for gliomas and the value of extent of resection. Neurotherapeutics 2009;6:478‐86. - PMC - PubMed
Sawaya 1998
    1. Sawaya R, Hammoud M, Schoppa D, Hess KR, Wu SZ, Shi WM, et al. Neurosurgical outcomes in a modem series of 400 craniotomies for treatment of parenchymal tumors . Neurosurgery 1998;42:1044‐1056. - PubMed
Seifert 2003
    1. Seifert V. Intraoperative MRI in neurosurgery: Technical overkill or the future of brain surgery?. Neurology India 2003;51:329‐32. - PubMed
Stummer 1998
    1. Stummer W, Stocker S, Wagner S, Stepp H, Fritsch C, Goetz C, et al. Intraoperative detection of malignant gliomas by 5‐aminolevulinic acid‐induced porphyrin fluorescence. Neurosurgery 1998;42:518–25. - PubMed
Stummer 2000
    1. Stummer W, Novotny A, Stepp H, Goetz C, Bise K, Reulen HJ. Fluorescence‐guidedresection of glioblastoma multiforme by using 5‐aminolevulinic acid‐induced porphyrins: a prospective study in 52 consecutive patients. Journal of Neurosurgery 2000;93:1003–13. - PubMed
Stupp 2005
    1. Stupp R, Mason WP, Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma . New England Journal of Medicine 2005;352:987‐96. - PubMed
Unsgaard 2006
    1. Unsgaard G, Rygh OM, Selbekk T, Müller TB, Kolstad F, Lindseth F, et al. Intra‐operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica 2006 Mar;148(3):235‐53. - PubMed
Wen 2010
    1. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, et al. Updated response assessment criteria in high grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro‐oncology working group. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2010;28(11):1963–72. - PubMed
WHO 1982
    1. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. American Journal of Clinical Oncology 1982;5:649–55. - PubMed
Yordanova 2011
    1. Yordanova YN, Moritz‐Gasser S, Duffau H. Awake surgery for WHO Grade II gliomas within "non‐eloquent" areas in the left dominant hemisphere: toward a "supratotal" resection. Journal of Neurosurgery 2011;115(2):232‐9. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources