In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review
- PMID: 24475912
- PMCID: PMC3912922
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-52
In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Background: The paper hand-held record (PHR) has been widely used as a tool to facilitate communication between health care providers and a pregnant woman. Since its inception in the 1950s, it has been described as a successful initiative, evolving to meet the needs of communities and their providers. Increasingly, the electronic health record (EHR) has dominated the healthcare arena and the maternity general practice shared-care arrangement seems to have adopted this initiative. A systematic review was conducted to determine perspectives of the PHR and the EHR with regards to data completeness; experiences of users and integration of care between women and health care providers.
Method: A literature search was conducted that included papers from 1985 to 2012. Studies were chosen if they fulfilled the inclusion criteria, reporting on: data completeness; experiences of users and integration of care between women and health care providers. Papers were extracted by one reviewer in consultation with two reviewers with expertise in maternity e-health and independently assessed for quality.
Results: A total of 43 papers were identified for the review, from an initial 6,816 potentially relevant publications. No papers were found that reported on data completeness in a maternity PHR or a maternity EHR, in a shared-care setting. Women described the PHR as important to their antenatal care and had a generally positive perception of using an EHR. Hospital clinicians reported generally positive experiences using a PHR, while both positive and negative impressions were found using an EHR. The few papers describing the use of the PHR and EHR by community clinicians were also divergent and inconclusive with regards to their experiences. In a general practice shared-care model, the PHR is a valuable tool for integration between the woman and the health care provider. While the EHR is an ideal initiative in the maternity setting, facilitating referrals and communication, there are issues of fragmentation and continued paper use.
Conclusions: There was a surprising gap in knowledge surrounding data completeness on maternity PHRs or EHRs. There is also a paucity of available impressions from community clinicians using both forms of the records.
Similar articles
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. Epidemiol Prev. 2013. PMID: 23851286 Italian.
-
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27536798
-
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(22):1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40417997 Review.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
Cited by
-
The impact of patient-held health records on continuity of care among asylum seekers in reception centres: a cluster-randomised stepped wedge trial in Germany.BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Aug 2;4(4):e001610. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001610. eCollection 2019. BMJ Glob Health. 2019. PMID: 31423347 Free PMC article.
-
Home-based records for poor mothers and children in Afghanistan, a cross sectional population based study.BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 17;19(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7076-7. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31208383 Free PMC article.
-
Sharing of clinical data in a maternity setting: how do paper hand-held records and electronic health records compare for completeness?BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:650. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0650-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25528664 Free PMC article.
-
Why Do Individuals with Diabetes Miss Their Dietitian Appointments? A Mixed-Methods Study on Barriers and Strategies for Improved Engagement in Diabetes Care.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;13(12):1409. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121409. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40565438 Free PMC article.
-
The practicalities of adapting UK maternity clinical information systems for observational research: Experiences of the POOL study.Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023 Aug 7;8(1):2072. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2072. eCollection 2023. Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023. PMID: 38414546 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hamilton SG. Obstetric record card for use in general practice. Practitioner. 1956;176(1051):79–81. - PubMed
-
- O'Sullivan TABN, Stokes D. Just what the doctor ordered: moving forward with electronic records (viewpoint), nutrition and dietetics. Nutr Diet. 2011;68:179–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2011.01525.x. - DOI
-
- Commonwealth of Australia D. Building a 21st Century Primary Health Care System: Australia's First National Primary Health Care Strategy. Canberra: Department of Health and Aging; 2009.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous