Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb;138(2):204-12.
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0675-OA.

Evaluation of Barrett esophagus by multiphoton microscopy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of Barrett esophagus by multiphoton microscopy

Jianxin Chen et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Feb.

Erratum in

  • Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 May;138(5):582

Abstract

Context: Multiphoton microscopy (MPM) based on 2-photon excitation fluorescence and second-harmonic generation allows simultaneous visualization of cellular details and extracellular matrix components of fresh, unfixed, and unstained tissue. Portable multiphoton microscopes, which could be placed in endoscopy suites, and multiphoton endomicroscopes are in development, but their clinical utility is unknown.

Objective: To examine fresh, unfixed endoscopic biopsies obtained from the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction to (1) define the MPM characteristics of normal esophageal squamous mucosa and gastric columnar mucosa, and (2) evaluate whether diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia/Barrett esophagus (BE) could be made reliably with MPM.

Design: The study examined 35 untreated, fresh biopsy specimens from 25 patients who underwent routine upper endoscopy. A Zeiss LSM 710 Duo microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, New York) coupled to a Spectra-Physics (Mountain View, California) Tsunami Ti:sapphire laser was used to obtain a MPM image within 4 hours of fresh specimen collection. After obtaining MPM images, the biopsy specimens were placed in 10% buffered formalin and submitted for routine histopathologic examination. Then, the MPM images were compared with the findings in the hematoxylin-eosin-stained, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections. The MPM characteristics of the squamous, gastric-type columnar and intestinal-type columnar epithelium were analyzed. In biopsies with discrepancy between MPM imaging and hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections, the entire tissue block was serially sectioned and reevaluated. A diagnosis of BE was made when endoscopic and histologic criteria were satisfied.

Results: Based on effective 2-photon excitation fluorescence of cellular reduced pyridine nucleotides and flavin adenine dinucleotide and lack of 2-photon excitation fluorescence of mucin and cellular nuclei, MPM could readily identify and distinguish among squamous epithelial cells, goblet cells, gastric foveolar-type mucous cells, and parietal cells in the area of gastroesophageal junction. Based on the cell types identified, the mucosa was defined as squamous, columnar gastric type (cardia/fundic-type), and metaplastic columnar intestinal-type/BE. Various types of mucosa seen in the study of 35 biopsies included normal squamous mucosa only (n = 14; 40%), gastric cardia-type mucosa only (n = 2; 6%), gastric fundic mucosa (n = 6; 17%), and both squamous and gastric mucosa (n = 13; 37%). Intestinal metaplasia was identified by the presence of goblet cells in 10 of 25 cases (40%) leading to a diagnosis of BE on MPM imaging and only in 7 cases (28%) by histopathology. In 3 of 35 biopsies (9%), clear-cut goblet cells were seen by MPM imaging but not by histopathology, even after the entire tissue block was sectioned. Based on effective 2-photon excitation fluorescence of elastin and second-harmonic generation of collagen, connective tissue in the lamina propria and the basement membrane was also visualized with MPM.

Conclusions: Multiphoton microscopy has the ability to accurately distinguish squamous epithelium and different cellular elements of the columnar mucosa obtained from biopsies around the gastroesophageal junction, including goblet cells that are important for the diagnosis of BE. Thus, use of MPM in the endoscopy suite might provide immediate microscopic images during endoscopy, improving screening and surveillance of patients with BE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Normal esophageal squamous epithelium. A, Multiphoton microscopy image shows architecture of typical squamous epithelium with a single papilla in normal esophagus. B, The corresponding light-microscopic image shows the same feature (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification, ×400).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reflux esophagitis. A, Multiphoton microscopy image shows obviously more papillae; however, intraepithelial inflammatory cells are difficult to identify. B, The corresponding light-microscopic image shows the squamous epithelium with intraepithelial neutrophils and lymphocytes (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×400).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Normal gastric epithelium. A, Multiphoton microscopy image shows architecture of typical columnar epithelium in gastric cardia with gastric glands (≤60 m depth). B, The corresponding light-microscopic images confirm the above features. C, Multiphoton microscopy reveals individual gastric oxyntic glands that are separated by a mesh of collagen fibers at the deeper part of the mucosal layer (≥60 m depth) D, The corresponding light-microscopic image shows there are chief cells and parietal cells in each gastric gland (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnifications ×400 [B and D]).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Barrett esophagus without dysplasia at the upper part of the mucosal layer. A, Multiphoton microscopy image shows the specialized columnar epithelium with appearance of goblet cells in Barrett esophagus (≤60 m depth). B, The corresponding light-microscopic image confirms the above features (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×400).

References

    1. Shaheen NJ, Richter JE. Barrett’s oesophagus. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):850–861. - PubMed
    1. Spechler SJ. Clinical practice: Barrett’s esophagus. New Engl J Med. 2002;346(11):836–842. - PubMed
    1. Lepage C, Rachet B, Jooste V, Faivre J, Coleman MP. Continuing rapid increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma in England and Wales. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(11):2694–2699. - PubMed
    1. Pohl H, Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(2):142–146. - PubMed
    1. Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, et al. Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202(4):588–596. discussion 596–588. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources