Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality?
- PMID: 24477377
- PMCID: PMC3946094
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3187-0
Shared decision-making in back pain consultations: an illusion or reality?
Abstract
Purpose: Amid a political agenda for patient-centred healthcare, shared decision-making is reported to substantially improve patient experience, adherence to treatment and health outcomes. However, observational studies have shown that shared decision-making is rarely implemented in practice. The purpose of this study was to measure the prevalence of shared decision-making in clinical encounters involving physiotherapists and patients with back pain.
Method: Eighty outpatient encounters (comprising 40 h of data) were observed audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the 12-item OPTION scale. The higher the score, the greater is the shared decision-making competency of the clinicians.
Results: The mean OPTION score was 24.0% (range 10.4-43.8%).
Conclusion: Shared decision-making was under-developed in the observed back pain consultations. Clinicians' strong desire to treat acted as a barrier to shared decision-making and further work should focus on when and how it can be implemented.
References
-
- Improving chronic disease management. London: Department of Health; 2004.
-
- Coulter A, Collins A (2011) Making shared decision-making a reality. No decision about me, without me. The King’s Fund. http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/Making-shared-decision-making.... Accessed 11 June 2013
-
- Elwyn G, Charles C. Shared decision-making: the principles and the competencies. In: Edwards A, Elwyn G, editors. Evidence-based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. pp. 118–143.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical