Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan 20:2:2.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00002. eCollection 2014.

Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery - a review

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of outcome in hypospadias surgery - a review

Alexander Springer. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Hypospadias is a challenging field of urogenital reconstructive surgery with different techniques being currently used. Modern surgery claims that it is possible to create a functionally and cosmetically normal penis. Continuous re-evaluation and assessment of outcome may have a major impact on future clinical practice. Assessment of outcome includes: complication rate, cosmetic appearance of the penis, functional outcome (micturition, sexuality), and psychological factors such as quality of life and psychosexual life. This article briefly reviews current strategies of outcome assessment. Somehow in the future, we will be able to give an accurate estimation of the long-term consequences of being born with hypospadias.

Keywords: assessment; audit; complications; hypospadias; outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Springer A, Subramaniam R, Tekgul S, Riedmiller H, Hoebeke P, Kocvara R, et al. EAU guidelines on vesicoureteral reflux in children. Eur Urol (2012) 62:534–4210.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snodgrass W. Hypospadias reporting – how good is the literature? J Urol (2010) 184:1255–610.1016/j.juro.2010.07.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castagnetti M, El-Ghoneimi A. Surgical management of primary severe hypospadias in children: systematic 20-year review. J Urol (2010) 184:1469–7410.1016/j.juro.2010.06.044 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Salle JL. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias: a literature review. Indian J Urol (2008) 24:219–2510.4103/0970-1591.40619 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang F, Xu Y, Zhong H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the perimeatal-based flap and tubularized incised-plate techniques for primary hypospadias repair. Pediatr Surg Int (2013) 29:811–2110.1007/s00383-013-3335-3 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources