Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
- PMID: 24479410
- PMCID: PMC3979104
- DOI: 10.1186/ar4465
Patients' preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
Abstract
Introduction: The patient's perspective is becoming increasingly important in clinical and policy decisions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the preferences of patients with, or at risk of, osteoporosis for medication attributes, and to establish how patients trade between these attributes.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment survey was designed and patients were asked to choose between two hypothetical unlabelled drug treatments (and an opt-out option) that vary in five attributes: efficacy in reducing the risk of fracture, type of potential common side-effects, mode and frequency of administration and out-of-pocket costs. An efficient experimental design was used to construct the treatment option choice sets and a mixed logit panel data model was used to estimate patients' preferences and trade-offs between attributes.
Results: A total of 257 patients with, or at risk of, osteoporosis completed the experiment. As expected, patients preferred treatment with higher effectiveness and lower cost. They also preferred either an oral monthly tablet or 6-month subcutaneous injection above weekly oral tablets, 3-month subcutaneous, 3-month intravenous or yearly intravenous injections. Patients disliked being at risk of gastro-intestinal disorders more than being at risk of skin reactions and flu-like symptoms. There was significant variation in preferences across the sample for all attributes except subcutaneous injection.
Conclusions: This study revealed that osteoporotic patients preferred 6-month subcutaneous injection and oral monthly tablet, and disliked gastro-intestinal disorders. Moreover, patients were willing to pay a personal contribution or to trade treatment efficacy for better levels of other attributes. Preferences for treatment attributes varied across patients and this highlights the importance of clinical decision-making taking individual preferences into account to improve osteoporosis care.
Comment in
-
Using Discrete Choice Experiment to elicit patient preferences for osteoporosis drug treatments: where to from here?Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(2):106. doi: 10.1186/ar4501. Epub 2014 Mar 10. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014. PMID: 25167089 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, Johnson FR, Mauskopf J. Conjoint analysis applications in health – a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;16:403–413. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ. 2011;16:d1745. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
