Incidence and clinical significance of vascular encroachment resulting from freehand placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws
- PMID: 24480963
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000221
Incidence and clinical significance of vascular encroachment resulting from freehand placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective case series.
Objective: Evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of vascular encroachment resulting from freehand placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbosacral spine.
Summary of background data: Pedicle screws are routinely used to effectively stabilize all 3 columns of the spine but can be technically demanding to place in the setting of variable anatomy. There is a paucity of data regarding iatrogenic major vascular injuries during posterior instrumentation procedures.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients undergoing freehand pedicle screw placement without image guidance in the thoracic or lumbar spine during a 7-year period. The incidence and extent of vascular encroachment by a pedicle screw was determined by review of routine postoperative computed tomographic scans obtained within 24 hours of all surgical procedures. Vascular encroachment was defined as a pedicle screw that was touching or deforming the wall of a major vessel.
Results: A total of 964 patients received 6816 freehand-placed pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine. Fifteen (0.22%) screws that encroached a major vascular structure were identified. Ten (0.29%) thoracic pedicle screws encroached on the aorta, 4 (0.14%) lumbar screws on the common iliac vein, and 1 S1 screw (0.19%) on the internal iliac vein. In consultation with vascular surgery, it was determined whether revision surgery and the technique/approach for the revision procedure should be recommended. Two (0.21%) patients required revision surgery to remove the encroaching pedicle screw (T5 and T8) due to concern for vascular injury. Both patients were asymptomatic and recovered without further complications after revision surgery.
Conclusion: Vascular encroachment of major vessels occurs rarely in the setting of freehand pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine. Although rare, delayed vascular injury from errant pedicle screw placement has been reported in the literature. The aorta seems to be the vessel at the highest risk of injury. Routine intraoperative or postoperative computed tomographic scanning allows for early identification of pedicle screws encroaching on vascular structures thereby facilitating early revision surgery.
Level of evidence: 4.
Similar articles
-
Using the freehand pedicle screw placement technique in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: what is the incidence of neurological symptoms secondary to misplaced screws?Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 15;39(4):286-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000127. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014. PMID: 24553446
-
A retrospective analysis of pedicle screws in contact with the great vessels.J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):403-6. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09657. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010. PMID: 20809738
-
Free-hand pedicle screw placement during revision spinal surgery: analysis of 552 screws.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):1141-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f28a1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. PMID: 18449050
-
Malpositioned pedicle screw in spine deformity surgery endangering the aorta: report of two cases, review of literature, and proposed management algorithm.Spine Deform. 2020 Aug;8(4):809-817. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00094-5. Epub 2020 Mar 13. Spine Deform. 2020. PMID: 32170660 Review.
-
Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35,630 pedicle screws.Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct;31(4):E8. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11168. Neurosurg Focus. 2011. PMID: 21961871 Review.
Cited by
-
Intraoperative imaging adequacy and its impact on unplanned return-to-theatre rates in pedicle screw instrumentation.World J Orthop. 2025 Mar 18;16(3):103955. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.103955. eCollection 2025 Mar 18. World J Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40124730 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed open treatment of aortic penetration by a thoracic pedicle screw: illustrative case.J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023 Feb 27;5(9):CASE22533. doi: 10.3171/CASE22533. Print 2023 Feb 27. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023. PMID: 36852772 Free PMC article.
-
Severe major vessel injury during peadicle screw removal: a case report.Front Surg. 2023 Jun 13;10:1187801. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1187801. eCollection 2023. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 37383382 Free PMC article.
-
The summary of experience of abdominal vascular injury related to posterior lumbar surgery.Int Orthop. 2019 Sep;43(9):2191-2198. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4262-7. Epub 2019 Jan 14. Int Orthop. 2019. PMID: 30643934
-
Delayed presentation of infected common iliac artery pseudoaneurysm caused by malpositioned pedicle screw after minimally invasive scoliosis surgery.Eur Spine J. 2019 Jun;28(Suppl 2):68-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06005-1. Epub 2019 May 14. Eur Spine J. 2019. PMID: 31089815
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials