Rhythms as photoperiodic timers in the control of flowring in Chenopodium rubrum L
- PMID: 24481608
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00386700
Rhythms as photoperiodic timers in the control of flowring in Chenopodium rubrum L
Abstract
In C. rubrum, the amount of flowering that is induced by a single dark period interrupting continuous light depends upon the duration of darkness. A rhythmic oscillation in sensitivity to the time that light terminates darkness regulates the level of flowering. The period length of this oscillation is close to 30 hours, peaks of the rhythm occurring at about 13, 43 and 73 h of darkness.Phasing of the rhythm by 6-, 12- and 18-h photoperiods was studied by exposing plants to a given photoperiod at different phases of the free-running oscillation in darkness. The shift in phase of the rhythm was then determined by varying the length of the dark period following the photoperiod; this dark period was terminated by continuous light.With a 6-h photoperiod the timing of both the light-on and light-off signals is shown to control rhythm phasing. However, when the photoperiod is increased to 12 or 18 h, only the light-off signal determines phasing of the rhythm. In prolonged periods of irradiation-12 to 62 h light-a "durational" response to light overrides any interaction between the timing of the light period and the position of the oscillation at which light is administered. Such prolonged periods of irradiation apparently suspend or otherwise interact with the rhythm so that, in a following dark period, it is reinitiated at a fixed phase relative to the time of the light-off signal to give a peak of the rhythm 13 h after the dusk signal.In daily photoperiodic cycles rhythm phasing by a 6-h photocycle was also estimated by progressively increasing the number of cycles given prior to a single dark period of varied duration.In confirmation of Bünning's (1936) hypothesis, calculated and observed phasing of the rhythm controlling flowering in c. rubrum accounts for the photoperiodic response of this species. Evidence is also discussed which indicates that the timing of disappearance of phytochrome Pfr may limit flowering over the early hours of darkness.
Similar articles
-
The role of phytochrome in photoperiodic time measurement and its relation to rhythmic timekeeping in the control of flowering in Chenopodium rubrum.Planta. 1972 Mar;108(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/BF00386505. Planta. 1972. PMID: 24473744
-
Photoperiodic Control of Flowering in Dark-Grown Seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy : The Effect of Skeleton and Continuous Light Photoperiods.Plant Physiol. 1982 Jul;70(1):277-82. doi: 10.1104/pp.70.1.277. Plant Physiol. 1982. PMID: 16662460 Free PMC article.
-
Two flowering locus T (FT) homologs in Chenopodium rubrum differ in expression patterns.Planta. 2008 Nov;228(6):929-40. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0792-3. Epub 2008 Jul 25. Planta. 2008. PMID: 18654796
-
Insect photoperiodism: measuring the night.J Insect Physiol. 2013 Jan;59(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 23. J Insect Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23183333 Review.
-
Dormancy, Diapause, and the Role of the Circadian System in Insect Photoperiodism.Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:373-389. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025116. Epub 2019 Oct 8. Annu Rev Entomol. 2020. PMID: 31594413 Review.
Cited by
-
Different circadian rhythms regulate photoperiodic flowering response and leaf movement in Pharbitis nil (L.) Choisy.Planta. 1977 Jan;135(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00387162. Planta. 1977. PMID: 24420015
-
The role of phytochrome in photoperiodic time measurement and its relation to rhythmic timekeeping in the control of flowering in Chenopodium rubrum.Planta. 1972 Mar;108(1):39-57. doi: 10.1007/BF00386505. Planta. 1972. PMID: 24473744
-
Light requirement, phytochrome and photoperiodic induction of flowering of Pharbitis nil Chois : III. A comparison of spectrophotometric and physiological assay of phytochrome transformation during induction.Planta. 1978 Jan;141(1):15-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00387738. Planta. 1978. PMID: 24414626