Building clinical networks: a developmental evaluation framework
- PMID: 24481646
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002405
Building clinical networks: a developmental evaluation framework
Abstract
Background: Clinical networks have been designed as a cross-organisational mechanism to plan and deliver health services. With recent concerns about the effectiveness of these structures, it is timely to consider an evidence-informed approach for how they can be developed and evaluated.
Objective: To document an evaluation framework for clinical networks by drawing on the network evaluation literature and a 5-year study of clinical networks.
Method: We searched literature in three domains: network evaluation, factors that aid or inhibit network development, and on robust methods to measure network characteristics. This material was used to build a framework required for effective developmental evaluation.
Results: The framework's architecture identifies three stages of clinical network development; partner selection, network design and network management. Within each stage is evidence about factors that act as facilitators and barriers to network growth. These factors can be used to measure progress via appropriate methods and tools. The framework can provide for network growth and support informed decisions about progress.
Conclusions: For the first time in one place a framework incorporating rigorous methods and tools can identify factors known to affect the development of clinical networks. The target user group is internal stakeholders who need to conduct developmental evaluation to inform key decisions along their network's developmental pathway.
Keywords: Evaluation methodology; Healthcare quality improvement; Implementation science.
Similar articles
-
Developing a managed clinical network in palliative care: a realistic evaluation.Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Feb;44(2):183-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.027. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007. PMID: 16423354
-
Development and evaluation of a "working together" framework and a tool kit to enhance inter-organizational relationships in healthcare.Healthc Q. 2013;16(2):36-42. Healthc Q. 2013. PMID: 24863448
-
The challenges of evaluating health systems networks: lessons learned from an early evaluation of the Child Health Network for the Greater Toronto Area.Healthc Manage Forum. 2007 Summer;20(2):22-7. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60511-X. Healthc Manage Forum. 2007. PMID: 17727205
-
Beyond the rhetoric: what do we mean by a 'model of care'?Aust J Adv Nurs. 2006 Mar-May;23(3):47-55. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16568879 Review.
-
The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology.Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):350-9. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 9917477 Review.
Cited by
-
Informatics-based Challenges of Building Collaborative Healthcare Research and Analysis Networks from Rural Community Health Centers.IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform. 2016 Feb;2016:513-516. doi: 10.1109/BHI.2016.7455947. Epub 2016 Apr 21. IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform. 2016. PMID: 28133639 Free PMC article.
-
Towards equity and sustainability of rural and remote health services access: supporting social capital and integrated organisational and professional development.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 2;16:111. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1359-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27038803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The evolution and co-evolution of a primary care cancer research network: From academic social connection to research collaboration.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 29;17(7):e0272255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272255. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35905116 Free PMC article.
-
Collaborative research networks in health: a pragmatic scoping study for the development of an imaging network.Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Dec 9;13:76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0067-y. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015. PMID: 26652643 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical