Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Jan-Feb;15(1):51-8.
doi: 10.1177/2325957414520980. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

The Impact of Key HIV Intervention Components as Predictors of Sexual Barrier Use: The Zambia Partner Project

Ndashi Chitalu  1 , Mirriam Mumbi  1 , Ryan Cook  2 , Stephen M Weiss  2 , Deborah Jones  3
Affiliations

The Impact of Key HIV Intervention Components as Predictors of Sexual Barrier Use: The Zambia Partner Project

Ndashi Chitalu et al. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2016 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Behavioral interventions have utilized a variety of strategies and components to reduce HIV risk. This article describes the partner intervention, a couple-based group HIV risk reduction intervention implemented in 6 urban community health clinics in Lusaka, Zambia, and examines the components of the intervention and their relationship with condom use. Couple members completed assessments on condom use, acceptability, willingness to use condoms, communication, intimate partner violence (IPV), self-efficacy, and HIV information at baseline and 6 months' follow-up. This study examined the relative impact of elements of the intervention as predictors of condom use. Changes in acceptability had the greatest overall influence on condom use, followed by social support, relationship consensus, and willingness to use condoms. Changes in self-efficacy, IPV, negotiation, and information had no influence. Results support the use of multidimensional approaches in behavioral interventions and highlight the importance of identifying critical elements of interventions to maximize risk reduction outcomes.

Keywords: Africa; HIV; couples; intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNAIDS. Report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. [Accessed November 5, 2013];2013 http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/epidemiolo....
    1. Noar SM. Behavioral interventions to reduce HIV-related sexual risk behavior: review and synthesis of meta-analytic evidence. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(3):335–353. - PubMed
    1. Johnson BT, Scott-Sheldon LA, Huedo-Medina TB, Carey MP. Interventions to reduce sexual risk for human immunodeficiency virus in adolescents: a meta-analysis of trials, 1985-2008. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(1):77–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Earl A, Albarracin D. Nature, decay, and spiraling of the effects of fear-inducing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: a meta-analysis of the short- and long-term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Health Psychol. 2007;26(4):496–506. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lacroix JM, Pellowski JA, Lennon CA, Johnson BT. Behavioural interventions to reduce sexual risk for HIV in heterosexual couples: a meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(8):620–627. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources