Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;271(2):445-51.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131601. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry

Adam Lukasiewicz  1 , Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield, Laura Coombs, Monica Ghita, Jeffrey Weinreb, Gowthaman Gunabushanam, Christopher L Moore
Affiliations

Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: a report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry

Adam Lukasiewicz et al. Radiology. 2014 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine radiation dose indexes for computed tomography (CT) performed with renal colic protocols in the United States, including frequency of reduced-dose technique usage and any institutional-level factors associated with high or low dose indexes.

Materials and methods: The Dose Imaging Registry (DIR) collects deidentified CT data, including examination type and dose indexes, for CT performed at participating institutions; thus, the DIR portion of the study was exempt from institutional review board approval and was HIPAA compliant. CT dose indexes were examined at the institutional level for CT performed with a renal colic protocol at institutions that contributed at least 10 studies to the registry as of January 2013. Additionally, patients undergoing CT for renal colic at a single institution (with institutional review board approval and informed consent from prospective subjects and waiver of consent from retrospective subjects) were studied to examine individual renal colic CT dose index patterns and explore relationships between patient habitus, demographics, and dose indexes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze dose indexes, and linear regression and Spearman correlations were used to examine relationships between dose indexes and institutional factors.

Results: There were 49 903 renal colic protocol CT examinations conducted at 93 institutions between May 2011 and January 2013. Mean age ± standard deviation was 49 years ± 18, and 53.9% of patients were female. Institutions contributed a median of 268 (interquartile range, 77-699) CT studies. Overall mean institutional dose-length product (DLP) was 746 mGy ⋅ cm (effective dose, 11.2 mSv), with a range of 307-1497 mGy ⋅ cm (effective dose, 4.6-22.5 mSv) for mean DLPs. Only 2% of studies were conducted with a DLP of 200 mGy ⋅ cm or lower (a "reduced dose") (effective dose, 3 mSv), and only 10% of institutions kept DLP at 400 mGy ⋅ cm (effective dose, 6 mSv) or less in at least 50% of patients.

Conclusion: Reduced-dose renal protocol CT is used infrequently in the United States. Mean dose index is higher than reported previously, and institutional variation is substantial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01352676.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: A.L. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. M.B. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. L.C. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. M.G. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. J.W. Financial activities related to the present article: author received fees from Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals for speaking and consulting, and institution received research support from Siemens. Financial activities not related to the present article: none to disclose. Other relationships: none to disclose. G.G. No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. C.L.M. Financial activities related to the present article: none to disclose. Financial activities not related to the present article: author received fees from Sonosite for consulting and from Philips Healthcare for development of educational products. Other relationships: none to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of institutions shows mean DLP to the nearest 100 mGy · cm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histogram shows number of CT studies in a prospective emergency department sample (total, n = 516) with DLP to the nearest 100 mGy · cm.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Moe OW. Kidney stones: pathophysiology and medical management. Lancet. 2006;367(9507):333–344. - PubMed
    1. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LMJ, Curhan GC. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int. 2003;63(5):1817–1823. - PubMed
    1. Ljunghall S, Danielson BG. A prospective study of renal stone recurrences. Br J Urol. 1984;56(2):122–124. - PubMed
    1. Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of non–contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology. 1995;194(3):789–794. - PubMed
    1. Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Shuman WP. Evaluation of the patient with flank pain and possible ureteral calculus. Radiology. 2003;228(2):319–329. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data