Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response
- PMID: 2448428
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.2.329
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response
Abstract
Following observation of the predictive value of the histologic extent of tumor cell destruction after preoperative chemotherapy for metastasis-free survival (MFS) in osteosarcoma, a randomized study was undertaken with the aim of (1) sparing some patients the unpleasant side effects of highly toxic drugs like doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CPDD) by administering these drugs postoperatively only after poor response with a milder preoperative regimen, and (2) improving the prognosis of patients responding poorly to the initial treatment by use of a salvage chemotherapy postoperatively. The available patients were divided into two groups. Those in the study arm received a preoperative chemotherapy consisting of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) and the triple drug combination of bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin (BCD) and were switched to DOX/CPDD postoperatively in case of poor response. DOX/CPDD was used besides HDMTX for initial treatment in the control arm, and BCD alternatively with CPDD/ifosfamide (IFO) for postoperative salvage treatment. The response rate of the study arm was significantly inferior to the control arm (26% v 60%; P less than .001). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of poor responders after salvage chemotherapy also was poorest in the study arm (41%); it was unchanged in the control arm (53%) as compared with that of poor responders from the COSS-80 study without salvage chemotherapy (52%). The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of good responders was 73% in the study arm, 79% in the control arm, and not significantly different from that of the COSS-80 study (84%), although postoperative chemotherapy of good responders had been markedly shortened as compared with the COSS-80 study. The actuarial 4-year MFS rate of the study arm as a whole was inferior to that of the control arm (49% v 68%; P less than .1) and also inferior to the COSS-80 study (68%; P less than .01), indicating a failure of the employed salvage strategy in general and especially of the effort to restrict the use of the very effective but highly toxic drugs DOX and CPDD to patients resistant to a less toxic initial treatment.
Similar articles
-
[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. Results of the cooperative studies COSS-80 and COSS-82 after 7 and 5 years].Klin Padiatr. 1989 Jul-Aug;201(4):275-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026715. Klin Padiatr. 1989. PMID: 2674532 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Neoadjuvant therapy for localized osteosarcoma of extremities. Results from the Cooperative osteosarcoma study group COSS of 925 patients].Klin Padiatr. 1999 Jul-Aug;211(4):260-70. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1043798. Klin Padiatr. 1999. PMID: 10472560 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Treatment of osteosarcoma: experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS).Cancer Treat Res. 1993;62:269-77. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3518-8_32. Cancer Treat Res. 1993. PMID: 7682088 Review.
-
Treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity with preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):76-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.76. J Clin Oncol. 1997. PMID: 8996127 Clinical Trial.
-
Local control and survival from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group studies of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and the Vienna Bone Tumor Registry.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Sep;(270):79-86. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991. PMID: 1715820 Review.
Cited by
-
Morphologic characterization of osteosarcoma growth on the chick chorioallantoic membrane.BMC Res Notes. 2010 Mar 4;3:58. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-58. BMC Res Notes. 2010. PMID: 20202196 Free PMC article.
-
Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in randomised controlled trials of localised osteosarcoma: A meta-analytic evaluation.Sci Rep. 2020 May 22;10(1):8573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65591-z. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32444660 Free PMC article.
-
Tumor histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in childhood solid malignancies: is it still impressive?J Investig Med. 2018 Feb;66(2):289-297. doi: 10.1136/jim-2017-000531. Epub 2017 Sep 27. J Investig Med. 2018. PMID: 28954845 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical factors affecting prognosis of limb osteosarcoma in China: a multicenter retrospective analysis.J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520930856. doi: 10.1177/0300060520920053. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32865070 Free PMC article.
-
SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of osteosarcoma in adults-2013.Clin Transl Oncol. 2013 Dec;15(12):1037-43. doi: 10.1007/s12094-013-1087-0. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Clin Transl Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23907290
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical