Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Feb 1:15:44.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-44.

Targeted rehabilitation to improve outcome after total knee replacement (TRIO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Targeted rehabilitation to improve outcome after total knee replacement (TRIO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

A Hamish R W Simpson et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Approximately 20% of patients are not satisfied with the outcome of total knee replacement, great volumes of which are carried out yearly. Physiotherapy is often provided by the NHS to address dysfunction following knee replacement; however the efficacy of this is unknown. Although clinically it is accepted that therapy is useful, provision of physiotherapy to all patients post-operatively does not enhance outcomes at one year. No study has previously assessed the effect of targeting therapy to individuals struggling to recover in the early post-operative phase.The aim of the TRIO study is to determine whether stratifying care by targeting physiotherapy to those individuals performing poorly following knee replacement is effective in improving the one year outcomes. We are also investigating whether the structure of the physiotherapy provision itself influences outcomes.

Methods/design: The study is a multi-centre prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) of patients undergoing primary total knee replacement, with treatment targeted at those deemed most susceptible to gain from it. Use of the national PROMS programme for pre-operative data collection allows us to screen all patients at initial post-operative clinical review, and recruit only those deemed to be recovering slowly.We aim to recruit 440 patients through various NHS orthopaedic centres who will undergo six weeks of physiotherapy. The intervention will be either 'intensive' involving both hospital and home-based functional exercise rehabilitation, or 'standard of care' consisting of home exercises. Patients will be randomised to either group using a web-based system. Both groups will receive pre and post-intervention physiotherapy review. Patients will be followed-up to one year post-operation. The primary outcome measure is the Oxford Knee Score. Secondary outcomes are patient satisfaction, functional ability, pain scores and cost-effectiveness.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN23357609. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01849445.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flowchart.

References

    1. Seventh Annual Report. Seventh Annual Report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk.
    1. Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Kiran A, Judge A, Javaid MK, Cooper C, Arden NK. The lifetime risk of total hip and knee arthroplasty: results from the UK general practice research database. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20:519–524. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.636. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, Patton JT, Macdonald D, Simpson AH, Howie CR. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4,709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open. 2013;9:3(4). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton DF, Henderson GR, Gaston P, MacDonald D, Howie C, Simpson AH. Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Postgrad Med J. 2012;88:627–631. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130715. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 22,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:262–267. doi: 10.1080/000164700317411852. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data