Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Feb 1:12:14.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-14.

Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the 10-item CD-RISC in patients with fibromyalgia

Affiliations
Observational Study

Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the 10-item CD-RISC in patients with fibromyalgia

Blanca Notario-Pacheco et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: No resilience scale has been validated in Spanish patients with fibromyalgia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the 10-item CD-RISC in a sample of Spanish patients with fibromyalgia.

Design: Observational prospective multicenter study.

Sample: Patients with diagnoses of fibromyalgia recruited from primary care settings (N = 208).

Instruments: In addition to sociodemographic data, the following questionnaires were administered: Pain Visual Analogue Scale (PVAS), the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (10-item CD-RISC), the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ), and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS).

Results: Regarding construct validity, the factor solution in the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was considered adequate, so the KMO test had a value of 0.91, and the Barlett's test of sphericity was significant (χ2 = 852.8; gl = 45; p < 0.001). Only one factor showed an eigenvalue greater than 1, and it explained 50.4% of the variance. PCA and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) results did not show significant differences between groups. The 10-item CD-RISC scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.89 for a six-week interval). The 10-item CD-RISC score was significantly correlated with all of the other psychometric instruments in the expected direction, except for the PVAS (-0.115; p = 0.113).

Conclusions: Our study confirms that the Spanish version of the 10-item CD-RISC shows, in patients with fibromyalgia, acceptable psychometric properties, with a high level of reliability and validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sedimentation graph of factor components of 10-item CD-RISC.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Factor loading and goodness-of-fit indexes of one-factor model for the 10-items CD-RISC factor structure. Total sample: n = 208; χ2 = 68.215; df = 35; p = 0.001; CFI = 0.96; and SRMR = 0.041.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Van Houdenhove B, Egle U, Luyten P. The role of life stress in fibromyalgia. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2005;7:365–370. doi: 10.1007/s11926-005-0021-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carbonell-Abelló J. Fibromyalgia. Med Clin (Barc) 2005;125:778–779. doi: 10.1016/S0025-7753(05)72188-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berger A, Dukes E, Martin S, Edelsberg J, Oster G. Characteristics and healthcare costs of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61:1498–1508. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01480.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson JM, Luedtke CA, Oh TH, Shah ND, Long KH, King S, Branda M, Swanson R. Direct medical costs in patients with fibromyalgia: cost of illness and impact of a brief multidisciplinary treatment program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90:40–46. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181fc7ff3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanchez RJ, Uribe C, Li H, Alvir J, Deminski M, Chandran A, Palacio A. Longitudinal evaluation of health care utilization and costs during the first three years after a new diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27:663–671. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.550605. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms