Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb;28(1):29-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

Laparoscopy for colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Review

Laparoscopy for colorectal cancer

P J Tanis et al. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

The laparoscopic approach for colorectal cancer resection has been evolved from an experimental procedure with oncological concerns to routine daily practice within a period of two decades. Numerous randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that laparoscopic resection results in faster recovery with similar oncological outcome compared to an open approach, both for colon and rectal cancer. Besides improved cosmesis, other long-term advantages seem to be less adhesion related small bowel obstruction and reduced incisional hernia rate. Adequate patient selection and surgical experience are of crucial importance. Experience can be gradually expanded step by step, by increasing the complexity of the procedure. A decision to convert should be made early in the procedure, because the outcome after a reactive conversion is worse than initial open resection or strategic conversion. The additive value of new techniques such as robotic surgery has to be proven in randomized studies including a cost-effectiveness assessment.

Keywords: Colon cancer; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Recovery; Rectal cancer; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources