Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy
- PMID: 24486472
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.048
Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy
Abstract
Background context: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) with or without microdiscectomy (posterior cervical discectomy [PCD]) is a frequently used surgical technique for cervical radiculopathy secondary to foraminal stenosis or a laterally located herniated disc. Currently, these procedures are being performed with increasing frequency using advanced minimally invasive techniques. Although the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive PCF/PCD (MI-PCF/PCD) have been established, reports on long-term outcome and need for secondary surgical intervention at the index or adjacent level are lacking.
Purpose: To determine the rates of complications, long-term outcomes, and need for secondary surgical intervention at the index or adjacent level after MI-PCF and microdiscectomy.
Study design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort.
Patient sample: Seventy patients treated with MI-PCF and/or MI-PCD for cervical radiculopathy.
Outcome measures: Visual Analog Scale for neck/arm (VASN/A) pain and Neck Disability Index (NDI).
Methods: Ninety-seven patients underwent MI-PCF with or without MI-PCD between 2002 and 2011. Adequate prospective follow-up was available for 70 patients (95 cervical levels). The primary outcome assessed was need for secondary surgical intervention at the index or adjacent level. The secondary outcomes assessed included complications and improvements in NDI and VASN/A scores. All complications were reviewed. Mixed-model analyses of variance with random subject effects and autoregressive first-order correlation structures were used to test for differences among NDI, VASA, and VASN measurements made over time while accounting for the correlation among repeated observations within a patient. All statistical hypothesis tests were conducted at the 5% level of significance.
Results: Patients were followed for a mean of 32.1 months. Of 70 patients operated, there were 3 (4.3%) complications (1 cerebrospinal fluid leak, 1 postoperative wound hematoma, and 1 radiculitis), none of which required a secondary operative intervention. Five patients required an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (eight total levels fused) on average 44.4 months after the index surgery. Of those, five (5.3%) were at the index level and three (2.1%) were at adjacent levels. Neck Disability Index scores improved significantly (p<.0001) immediately postoperatively and continued to decrease gradually with time. Visual Analog Scale for neck/arm scores improved significantly (p<.0001) from baseline immediately postoperatively but tended to plateau with time.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive PCF with or without MI-PCD is an excellent alternative for cervical radiculopathy secondary to foraminal stenosis or a laterally located herniated disc. There is a low rate (1.1% per index level per year) of future index site fusion and a very low rate (0.9% per adjacent level per year) of adjacent-level disease requiring surgery.
Keywords: Adjacent-level disease; Anterior cervical fusion; Complications; Microdiscectomy; Outcome scores; Posterior cervical foraminotomy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct;29(4):358-364. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.SPINE171003. Epub 2018 Jun 29. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29957145
-
Comparing outcomes between anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):800-806. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.12.010. Epub 2024 Jan 5. Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38185140
-
Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Alternative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):1731-1739. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003156. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31343619
-
Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):E215-E223. Pain Physician. 2018. PMID: 29871377
-
Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Via Full-Endoscopic Versus Microendoscopic Approach for Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Pain Physician. 2019 Jan;22(1):41-52. Pain Physician. 2019. PMID: 30700067
Cited by
-
Cervical Radiculopathy: Focus on Factors for Better Surgical Outcomes and Operative Techniques.Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):995-1012. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0445. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Asian Spine J. 2022. PMID: 36599372 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive Cervical Foraminotomy.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2016 Jun 8;6(2):e23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00012. eCollection 2016 Jun 22. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2016. PMID: 30237932 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Combined with Foraminotomy Assisted by High-Definition 3-Dimensional Exoscope in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy Secondary to Bony Foraminal Stenosis.Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(8):2318-2326. doi: 10.1111/os.13040. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Orthop Surg. 2021. PMID: 34750972 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Technique of Central and Over-the-Top Full-Endoscopic Decompression of the Cervical Spine: A Technical Note.J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 18;13(10):1508. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101508. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37888119 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy.Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2450-2458. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5017-7. Epub 2017 Mar 23. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28337706
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous