Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;12(4):320-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

The implementation and effectiveness of an enhanced recovery programme after oesophago-gastrectomy: a prospective cohort study

S J Ford  1 , D Adams  1 , S Dudnikov  1 , P Peyser  1 , J Rahamim  1 , T J Wheatley  1 , R G Berrisford  1 , G Sanders  2
Affiliations
Free article

The implementation and effectiveness of an enhanced recovery programme after oesophago-gastrectomy: a prospective cohort study

S J Ford et al. Int J Surg. 2014.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Oesophageal resection is notoriously complicated and produces a cohort of patients prone to postoperative complications. Maintaining quality care demands a systematic approach to patient management yet postoperative recovery after oesophagectomy is often needlessly inefficient, heterogeneous and governed by the idiosyncrasies of the operating surgeon. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes are now well established in colorectal surgery and here we describe the implementation and effectiveness of an ERAS programme for the postoperative management of Ivor Lewis oesophago-gastrectomy (ILOG).

Methods: An ERAS programme was devised and implemented with the support of a dedicated in-hospital task-force. Three consultant surgeons allocated consecutive patients to the programme (ERAS) and outcomes were compared to consecutive patients not on the ERAS programme (non-ERAS) and a pre-ERAS cohort (pre-ERAS). Principal outcome measures were total length of stay (TLOS), Accordion postoperative complication grade and 30-day readmission rate.

Results: 75 patients were enrolled on the ERAS programme, 41 continued as a non-ERAS cohort and 80 consecutive pre-ERAS patients were identified. A significant improvement in median TLOS was observed in the ERAS group (10 days r.7-58) compared to pre-ERAS (13 days r. 8-57) (p = <0.001) and non-ERAS patients (13 days r.8-42) (p = <0.001). No significant difference in Accordion scores for postoperative complications or 30-day readmission rates were observed.

Discussion: The introduction of an ERAS programme after ILOG can significantly reduce TLOS without jeopardising patient safety or clinical outcomes. The successful introduction of an ERAS programme requires full motivation and support from all team members including the patient.

Keywords: Enhanced recovery; Oesophagectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer