Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Apr;464(4):393-402.
doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1545-2. Epub 2014 Feb 1.

Gene expression profiling in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: from translational research to standard of care

Affiliations
Review

Gene expression profiling in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: from translational research to standard of care

John D Hainsworth et al. Virchows Arch. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) is diagnosed in approximately 3 % of patients with advanced cancer, and most patients have traditionally been treated with empiric chemotherapy. As treatments improve and become more specific for individual solid tumor types, therapy with a single empiric combination chemotherapy regimen becomes increasingly inadequate. Gene expression profiling (GEP) is a new diagnostic method that allows prediction of the site of tumor origin based on gene expression patterns retained from the normal tissues of origin. In blinded studies in tumors of known origin, GEP assays correctly identified the site of origin in 85 % of cases and compares favorably with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. In patients with CUP, GEP is able to predict a site of origin in >95 % of patients versus 35-55 % for IHC staining. Although confirmation of the accuracy of these predictions is difficult, the diagnoses made by IHC staining and GEP are identical in 77 % of cases when IHC staining predicts a single primary site. GEP diagnoses appear to be most useful when IHC staining is inconclusive. Site-specific treatment of CUP patients based on GEP and/or IHC predictions appears to improve overall outcomes; patients predicted to have treatment-sensitive tumor types derived the most benefit. GEP adds to the diagnostic evaluation of patients with CUP and should be included when IHC staining is unable to predict a single site of origin. Site-specific treatment, based on tissue of origin diagnosis, should replace empiric chemotherapy in patients with CUP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Mol Diagn. 2011 Jan;13(1):48-56 - PubMed
    1. Mol Cancer. 2013 Jun 10;12:57 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 2001 Oct 15;61(20):7388-93 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Diagn. 2006 Jul;8(3):320-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Feb;18(3):632-5 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources