Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2014 Apr;46(3):165-8.
doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000065.

Factors affecting the implementation and use of electronic templates for histopathology cancer reporting

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Editorial

Factors affecting the implementation and use of electronic templates for histopathology cancer reporting

Bettina Casati et al. Pathology. 2014 Apr.
Free PMC article
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Socio-technical model of an organisation's information system(s) (modified from Lyytinen and Newman11).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of the complex relationship between the individual health care worker, health care team, department, organisation, and other stakeholders potentially being influenced by or influencing upon an intended change (modified from Grol and Grimshaw14).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Factors affecting each individual health care worker's adoption and use of new information technology solutions (’Technology Acceptance Model’) (modified from Venkatesh and Bala15). All terms are explained with a pathologist's use of electronic synoptic reporting in mind (modified from Venkatesh and Bala and Davis19). Subjective Norm: A pathologist's perception of how most people who are important to her think she should or should not use electronic synoptic reporting. The norm can either be perceived as voluntary or compulsory. Perceived Image: The degree to which a pathologist believes that using electronic synoptic reporting would enhance her status in her job related social system. Perceived Job Relevance: The degree to which a pathologist believes that using electronic synoptic reporting would be relevant to her job tasks. Perceived Output Quality: The degree to which a pathologist believes that using electronic synoptic reporting would improve the overall quality of her pathology report. Result Demonstrability: How apparent the benefits of using electronic synoptic reporting are to the reporting pathologist. Perceived Ease of Use: The degree to which a pathologist believes that using electronic synoptic reporting would be free from effort. Perceived Usefulness: The degree to which a pathologist believes that using electronic synoptic reporting would enhance her job performance. Behavioural Intention: The degree to which a pathologist has formulated conscious plans to use (or not use) electronic synoptic reporting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zarbo RJ. Interinstitutional assessment of colorectal carcinoma surgical pathology report adequacy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of practice patterns from 532 laboratories and 15,940 reports. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992; 116:1113–1119 - PubMed
    1. Casati B, Bjugn R. Structured electronic template for histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections: five-year follow-up shows sustainable long-term quality improvement. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012; 136:652–656 - PubMed
    1. Cross SS, Feeley KM, Angel CA. The effect of four interventions on the informational content of histopathology reports of resected colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Pathol 1998; 51:481–482 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellis DW. Surgical pathology reporting at the crossroads: beyond synoptic reporting. Pathology 2011; 43:404–409 - PubMed
    1. Srigley JR, McGowan T, Maclean A, et al. Standardized synoptic cancer pathology reporting: a population-based approach. J Surg Oncol 2009; 99:517–524 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources