Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 23:8:271-82.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S52055. eCollection 2014.

Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008

Constantin-Dan Bordeianu  1
Affiliations

Critical analysis of the classification of glaucomas issued by the European Glaucoma Society in 2008

Constantin-Dan Bordeianu. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To critically analyze the 2008 European Glaucoma Society classification of glaucomas, in order to reveal its advantages and shortcomings.

Methods: The paper tries to determine the extent to which this classification is clear (being based on a coherent and consistently followed set of criteria), is comprehensive (framing all forms of glaucoma), helps to understand the sickness (using a logical framing system), and facilitates therapeutic decision making (offering direct therapeutic suggestions).

Results and conclusion: The paper shows that, compared with all the previous classifications, the 2008 European Glaucoma Society classification is one step ahead (in the way of classifying the group of secondary angle-closure glaucomas), two steps behind (in rejecting two useful categories of congenital glaucoma), and similar in several respects: that it is based on criticizable fundamental and secondary criteria that cannot cover all forms of sickness gathered at a particular crossing; that it uses several equally weighted criteria for one single crossing (division); that it frames one clinical entity in several clinical categories; that it does not reflect reality in some aspects; and that it does not offer direct therapeutic suggestions: after framing a case in a scheme built on the basis of gonioscopic observation, it requires a second stage of pathogenic analysis, so that the ophthalmologist is able to decide the correct treatment only in the third stage. All these considerations justify the efforts to find a new classification that will be able to correct the abovementioned shortcomings.

Keywords: classification of glaucomas; glaucoma; shortcomings of the 2008 EGS classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Donders FC. see Hoffmanns: vGraeffes Arch Ophthal. 1862;8(2):124.
    1. Duke-Elder WS Sir, editor. Glaucoma: a Symposium Organized by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Springfield: Thomas; 1955.
    1. Ourgaud AG, Étienne R. L’Exploration Fonctionelle de l’Oeil Glaucomateux: Rapport de la SFO [The functional investigation of glaucoma eye Report of the French Society of Ophthalmology] Paris: Masson; 1961. p. 2. French.
    1. Krasnov MM. [Pathogenic forms of glaucoma and principles governing their treatment] Vestn Oftalmol. 1965;78(5):29–35. Russian. - PubMed
    1. Saraux H, Biais B. Precis d’Ophthalmologie [Precis of Ophthalmology] Paris: Masson; 1969. French.

LinkOut - more resources