Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jan;62(1):55-9.
doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.126182.

Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter

Deepmala Mazumdar, J J M Pel, Manish Panday, Rashima Asokan, L Vijaya, B Shantha, Ronnie George  1 , J Van Der Steen
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter

Deepmala Mazumdar et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the saccadic reaction time (SRT) in both the central and peripheral visual field in normal and glaucomatous eyes using eye movement perimetery (EMP).

Materials and methods: Fifty-four normal and 25 glaucoma subjects underwent EMP and visual field testing on the Humphrey Field Analyser (HFA) 24-2 program. The EMP is based on infrared tracking of the corneal reflex. Fifty-four test locations corresponding to the locations on the 24-2 HFA program were tested. SRTs at different eccentricities and for different severities of glaucoma were compared between normal and glaucoma subjects.

Results: Mean SRT was calculated for both normal and glaucoma subjects. Mann-Whitney U test showed statistically significant (P < 0.001) differences in SRT's between normal and glaucoma subjects in all zones.

Conclusion: SRT was prolonged in eyes with glaucoma across different eccentricities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Eye movement perimeter display screen showing the tracking status for both eyes
Figure 2
Figure 2
Eye movement perimeter setup used for the study
Figure 3
Figure 3
Eye movement pattern in a Matlab window where a saccadic eye movement was made from the center towards a peripheral target in the lower left field
Figure 4
Figure 4
Measurement of saccadic reaction time from tracking data
Figure 5
Figure 5
Division of tested points into eight zones equidistant from the center
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of saccadic reaction times between normal and glaucoma at varying eccentricities (mean, error bars show standard errors)
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mean SRT in mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma at different eccentricities
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. George Re, Ve RS, Vijaya L. Glaucoma in India: Estimated burden of disease. J Glaucoma. 2010;19:391–7. - PubMed
    1. Bourne RR, Foster PJ, Bunce C, Peto T, Hitchings RA, Khaw PT, et al. The morphology of the optic nerve head in the Singaporean Chinese population (the Tanjong Pagar study): Part 1-Optic nerve head morphology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:303–9. - PubMed
    1. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:238–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toepfer A, Kasten E, Guenther T, Sabel BA. Perimetry while moving the eyes: Implications for the variability of visual field defects. J Neuroophthalmol. 2008;28:308–19. - PubMed

Publication types