Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 5;5(2):103-14.
doi: 10.7150/jca.6890. eCollection 2014.

Potential Urinary Protein Biomarker Candidates for the Accurate Detection of Prostate Cancer among Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

Affiliations

Potential Urinary Protein Biomarker Candidates for the Accurate Detection of Prostate Cancer among Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

Taha A Haj-Ahmad et al. J Cancer. .

Abstract

Globally, Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently occurring non-cutaneous cancer, and is the second highest cause of cancer mortality in men. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) has been the standard in PCa screening since its approval by the American Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in 1994. Currently, PSA is used as an indicator for PCa - patients with a serum PSA level above 4ng/mL will often undergo prostate biopsy to confirm cancer. Unfortunately fewer than ~30% of these men will biopsy positive for cancer, meaning that the majority of men undergo invasive biopsy with little benefit. Despite PSA's notoriously poor specificity (33%), there is still a significant lack of credible alternatives. Therefore an ideal biomarker that can specifically detect PCa at an early stage is urgently required. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of using deregulation of urinary proteins in order to detect Prostate Cancer (PCa) among Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). To identify the protein signatures specific for PCa, protein expression profiling of 8 PCa patients, 12 BPH patients and 10 healthy males was carried out using LC-MS/MS. This was followed by validating relative expression levels of proteins present in urine among all the patients using quantitative real time-PCR. This was followed by validating relative expression levels of proteins present in urine among all the patients using quantitative real time-PCR. This approach revealed that significant the down-regulation of Fibronectin and TP53INP2 was a characteristic event among PCa patients. Fibronectin mRNA down-regulation, was identified as offering improved specificity (50%) over PSA, albeit with a slightly lower although still acceptable sensitivity (75%) for detecting PCa. As for TP53INP2 on the other hand, its down-regulation was moderately sensitive (75%), identifying many patients with PCa, but was entirely non-specific (7%), designating many of the benign samples as malignant and being unable to accurately identify more than one negative.

Keywords: Prostate Cancer. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urine. Proteins. Biomarkers..

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of initially collected PCa samples with either up, down or minimal deregulation in the expression of mRNAs for: Cadherin-1, Fibronectin or TP53INP2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of initially collected BPH samples with up, down or minimal deregulation in the expression of mRNAs for: Fibronectin or TP53INP2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of PCa samples with down-deregulation in the expression of mRNAs for: Fibronectin or TP53INP2. (Determined by RT-qPCR)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of BPH samples with down-deregulation in the expression of mRNAs for: Fibronectin or TP53INP2

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), Nat Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ and Cronin KA; http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2009_pops09/
    1. Boyle P, Severi G, Giles GG. The epidemiology of prostate cancer. Urology Clin North Am. 2003;30:209–217. - PubMed
    1. Yin M, Bastacky S, Chandran U, Becich MJ, Dhir R. Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer in the general population: a study of healthy organ donors. The J of Urology. 2008;179:892–895. - PubMed
    1. Dunn JE. Cancer epidemiology in populations of the United States—with emphasis on Hawaii and California—and Japan. Cancer Res. 1975;35(11 Pt. 2):3240–3245. - PubMed