Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Jun;121(7):809-19; discussion 820.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12574. Epub 2014 Feb 4.

Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Prevalence and risk of Down syndrome in monozygotic and dizygotic multiple pregnancies in Europe: implications for prenatal screening

B Boyle et al. BJOG. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To determine risk of Down syndrome (DS) in multiple relative to singleton pregnancies, and compare prenatal diagnosis rates and pregnancy outcome.

Design: Population-based prevalence study based on EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries.

Setting: Eight European countries.

Population: 14.8 million births 1990-2009; 2.89% multiple births.

Methods: DS cases included livebirths, fetal deaths from 20 weeks, and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA). Zygosity is inferred from like/unlike sex for birth denominators, and from concordance for DS cases.

Main outcome measures: Relative risk (RR) of DS per fetus/baby from multiple versus singleton pregnancies and per pregnancy in monozygotic/dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies. Proportion of prenatally diagnosed and pregnancy outcome.

Statistical analysis: Poisson and logistic regression stratified for maternal age, country and time.

Results: Overall, the adjusted (adj) RR of DS for fetus/babies from multiple versus singleton pregnancies was 0.58 (95% CI 0.53-0.62), similar for all maternal ages except for mothers over 44, for whom it was considerably lower. In 8.7% of twin pairs affected by DS, both co-twins were diagnosed with the condition. The adjRR of DS for monozygotic versus singleton pregnancies was 0.34 (95% CI 0.25-0.44) and for dizygotic versus singleton pregnancies 1.34 (95% CI 1.23-1.46). DS fetuses from multiple births were less likely to be prenatally diagnosed than singletons (adjOR 0.62 [95% CI 0.50-0.78]) and following diagnosis less likely to be TOPFA (adjOR 0.40 [95% CI 0.27-0.59]).

Conclusions: The risk of DS per fetus/baby is lower in multiple than singleton pregnancies. These estimates can be used for genetic counselling and prenatal screening.

Keywords: Concordance; Down syndrome; monozygotic and dizygotic pregnancies; multiple births; pregnancy outcomes; twins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion (%) of mothers aged >35 by multiple/singleton birth status according to time period (1990–99, 2000–2007/9) and country.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence of DS per 10 000 singleton births and per 10 000 multiple births, 1990–99 and 2000–2009, by 5 years of maternal age for England and Wales and for the rest of Europe (nine registries) separately.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence of DS per per 10 000 singleton births and per 10 000 multiple births, 1990–99 and 2000–2009, by single year of maternal age, England and Wales.

References

    1. Cuckle H. Down’s syndrome screening in twins. J Med Screen. 1998;5:3–4. - PubMed
    1. Sebire NJ. Anomalous development in twins (including monozygotic duplication) In: Kilby MD, Baker P, Critchley H, Field D, editors. Multiple Pregnancy. 1st edn. London: RCOG; 2006. pp. 55–83.
    1. Madsen HN, Ball S, Wright D, Torring N, Petersen OB, Nicolaides KH, et al. A reassessment of biochemical marker distributions in trisomy 21-affected and unaffected twin pregnancies in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:38–47. - PubMed
    1. Cahill AG, Macones GA, Stamilio DM, Dicke JM, Crane JP, Odibo AO. Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:257.e1–e6. - PubMed
    1. Vink J, Fuchs K, D’Alton ME. Amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a systematic review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:409–16. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types