Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Feb 4:15:24.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-24.

Nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial

Irina Odnoletkova et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the efforts of the healthcare community to improve the quality of diabetes care, about 50% of people with type 2 diabetes do not reach their treatment targets, increasing the risk of future micro-and macro-vascular complications. Diabetes self-management education has been shown to contribute to better disease control. However, it is not known which strategies involving educational programs are cost-effective. Telehealth applications might support chronic disease management. Transferability of successful distant patient self-management support programs to the Belgian setting needs to be confirmed by studies of a high methodological quality. "The COACH Program" was developed in Australia as target driven educational telephone delivered intervention to support people with different chronic conditions. It proved to be effective in patients with coronary heart disease after hospitalization. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of The COACH Program in people with type 2 diabetes in Belgium needs to be assessed.

Methods/design: Randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were selected based on their medication consumption data and were recruited by their sickness fund. They were randomized to receive either usual care plus "The COACH Program" or usual care alone. The study will assess the difference in outcomes between groups. The primary outcome measure is the level of HbA1c. The secondary outcomes are: Total Cholesterol, LDL-Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Blood Pressure, body mass index, smoking status; proportion of people at target for HbA1c, LDL-Cholesterol and Blood Pressure; self-perceived health status, diabetes-specific emotional distress and satisfaction with diabetes care. The follow-up period is 18 months. Within-trial and modeled cost-utility analyses, to project effects over life-time horizon beyond the trial duration, will be undertaken from the perspective of the health care system if the intervention is effective.

Discussion: The study will enhance our understanding of the potential of telehealth in diabetes management in Belgium. Research on the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness is essential to support policy makers in future reimbursement and implementation decisions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01612520.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
RCT flowchart including the numbers of the enrolled and randomized patients.

References

    1. Standards of medical care in diabetes. American Diabetes Association; 2013. http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/Supplement_1/S11.full.
    1. Goderis G, Borgermans L, Heyrman J, Broeke CV, Grol R, Boland B, Mathieu C. Type 2 diabetes in primary care in belgium: need for structured shared care. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diab. 2009;117(8):367–372. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103286. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tricco AC, Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Mohler, Turner L, Galipeau J, Halperin I, Vachon B, Ramsay T, Manns B, Tonelli M, Shojania K. Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:2252–2261. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60480-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glyceamic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159–1171. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM. et al. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA. 2006;296:427–440. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.4.427. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data