Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;53(3-4):475-90.
doi: 10.1007/s10464-014-9625-7.

Twenty-first century science as a relational process: from eureka! to team science and a place for community psychology

Affiliations

Twenty-first century science as a relational process: from eureka! to team science and a place for community psychology

Jacob Kraemer Tebes et al. Am J Community Psychol. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

In this paper we maintain that twenty-first century science is, fundamentally, a relational process in which knowledge is produced (or co-produced) through transactions among researchers or among researchers and public stakeholders. We offer an expanded perspective on the practice of twenty-first century science, the production of scientific knowledge, and what community psychology can contribute to these developments. We argue that: (1) trends in science show that research is increasingly being conducted in teams; (2) scientific teams, such as transdisciplinary teams of researchers or of researchers collaborating with various public stakeholders, are better able to address complex challenges; (3) transdisciplinary scientific teams are part of the larger, twenty-first century transformation in science; (4) the concept of heterarchy is a heuristic for team science aligned with this transformation; (5) a contemporary philosophy of science known as perspectivism provides an essential foundation to advance twenty-first century science; and (6) community psychology, through its core principles and practice competencies, offers theoretical and practical expertise for advancing team science and the transformation in science currently underway. We discuss the implications of these points and illustrate them briefly with two examples of transdisciplinary team science from our own work. We conclude that a new narrative is emerging for science in the twenty-first century that draws on interpersonal transactions in teams, and active engagement by researchers with the public to address critical accountabilities. Because of its core organizing principles and unique blend of expertise on the intersection of research and practice, community psychologists are well-prepared to help advance these developments, and thus have much to offer twenty-first century science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams DB. Applying transdisciplinary research strategies to understanding and eliminating health disparities. Health Education & Behavior. 2006;33(4):515–531. - PubMed
    1. Adler N, Stewart J. Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1186:252–260. - PubMed
    1. Andrews JO, Tingen MS, Hurman C. Application of a CBPR framework to inform a multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2012;50:129–140. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arnsten A, Mazure C, Sinha R. This is your brain in meltdown. Scientific American. 2012 Apr;:50–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett LM, Gadlin H. Collaboration and team science: From theory to practice. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 2012;60:768–775. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types