Comparison of tolerance and cost-effectiveness of two nasal anesthesia techniques for transnasal flexible laryngoscopy
- PMID: 24496740
- DOI: 10.1177/0194599813519952
Comparison of tolerance and cost-effectiveness of two nasal anesthesia techniques for transnasal flexible laryngoscopy
Abstract
Objective: (1) Compare tolerance of aerosolized spray versus syringe administration of topical anesthesia for transnasal flexible laryngoscopy (TFL), (2) analyze cost-effectiveness of both techniques.
Study design: Prospective, blinded, randomized trial.
Setting: Tertiary academic laryngology practice.
Methods: One hundred and eight patients underwent TFL over 3 months. Patients were randomized to receive equivalent dose 1:1 neosynephrine/4% plain lidocaine mixture via aerosolized spray ("spray") or application with 1-cc syringe ("syringe"). Patients and physicians independently rated comfort of TFL on 5-point scale (1 = not at all comfortable to 5 = very comfortable). Data were collected on patient and endoscopist experience with TFL and reasons for poor tolerance of laryngoscopy. Cost analyses of disposable spray tips and syringes were calculated.
Results: Both patients and physicians reported very high tolerance of TFL. Patient tolerance appears to be similar between spray- versus syringe-administered anesthesia, although study limitations preclude definitive analysis. Poor tolerance of laryngoscopy was reported in 6.5% with comparable distribution between anesthetic delivery methods. There was no impact of patient prior experience with TFL, and there was no difference between anesthetic methods for TFL performed by resident, fellow, or attending. The difference between costs of the disposable spray tip versus syringe was $1.32 per unit.
Conclusions: Use of a 1-cc syringe is an effective method to provide topical nasal anesthesia for TFL and saves $1.32 per unit compared to disposable spray tips. In our practice, transition to syringe-administered nasal anesthesia is projected to save $1300 per 1000 patients, or an anticipated $1000 per year per physician, with excellent patient tolerance of TFL.
Keywords: anesthesia; cost effectiveness; laryngoscopy; office procedure; patient tolerance.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of lidocaine and levobupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012 May-Jun;26(3):e104-6. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012. PMID: 22643937 Clinical Trial.
-
Lidocaine spray vs tetracaine solution for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy.Am J Otolaryngol. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):114-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.11.011. Epub 2009 Mar 27. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010. PMID: 20015727 Clinical Trial.
-
Intranasal topical local anesthetic and decongestant for flexible nasendoscopy in children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;139(12):1301-5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5297. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013. PMID: 24158493 Clinical Trial.
-
Topical Anesthesia for Endoscopic Office-based Procedures of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract.J Voice. 2019 Sep;33(5):732-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Jul 13. J Voice. 2019. PMID: 30017430 Review.
-
Airway anesthesia: theory and practice.Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Jun;33(2):291-304. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.02.013. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015. PMID: 25999003 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision aid and preference assessment of topical anesthesia for otolaryngology procedures.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jun 25;6(4):794-799. doi: 10.1002/lio2.604. eCollection 2021 Aug. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021. PMID: 34401504 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources