Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study
- PMID: 24497573
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut435
Feasibility, safety, and short-term outcome of leadless ultrasound-based endocardial left ventricular resynchronization in heart failure patients: results of the wireless stimulation endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study
Abstract
Aims: Left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing may address the limitations in the selection of an LV pacing site and provide improvements in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) effectiveness. We report on the feasibility, the safety, and the short-term outcome of a leadless ultrasound-based technology for LV endocardial resynchronization in heart failure (HF) patients enroled into the Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) study.
Methods and results: Seventeen HF patients were enroled and categorized as: (i) patients in whom attempted coronary sinus lead implantation for CRT had failed (n = 7); (ii) patients with a previously implanted CRT device, not responding to CRT (n = 2); and (iii) patients with previously implanted pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and meeting the standard indications for CRT (n = 8). System implantation was achieved in 13 patients (76.5%); mean R-wave amplitude was 5.6 ± 3.2 mV and the mean pacing threshold was 1.6 ± 1.0 V, respectively. In one patient, no sufficient pacing thresholds were found; in three patients pericardial effusion occurred. Biventricular pacing was recorded in 83% and 92% of the patients at 1 month and 6 months, respectively. QRS duration was shorter during biventricular pacing compared with right ventricular pacing at 1 month (-41 ms; P = 0.0002) and 6 months (-42 ms; P = 0.0011), respectively. At the 6-month follow-up, two-thirds of the patients had at least one functional class change. Left ventricular ejection fraction significantly increased (P < 0.01) by 6 points at the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusion: The feasibility of providing an endocardial stimulation for CRT with a leadless technology was successfully demonstrated. Despite the promising results for a novel technology, further study is required to definitively conclude the safety and the performance of the system.
Clinical trial registration information: NCT01294527.
Keywords: Cardiac pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Outcome.
Comment in
-
Leadless endocardial left ventricular resynchronization: is it ready for prime time?Europace. 2014 May;16(5):623-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu075. Europace. 2014. PMID: 24798955 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
First-in-man implantation of leadless ultrasound-based cardiac stimulation pacing system: novel endocardial left ventricular resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients.Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1191-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut124. Epub 2013 May 23. Europace. 2013. PMID: 23703364
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Wireless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing: The SELECT-LV Study.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 2;69(17):2119-2129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.059. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28449772 Clinical Trial.
-
Real-world experience of leadless left ventricular endocardial cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter international registry of the WiSE-CRT pacing system.Heart Rhythm. 2020 Aug;17(8):1291-1297. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 9. Heart Rhythm. 2020. PMID: 32165181 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of wireless stimulation of the endocardium, WiSE, technology for treatment heart failure.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Jun;13(6):523-31. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1187559. Epub 2016 May 20. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016. PMID: 27157452 Review.
-
[Leadless endocardial ultrasound based left ventricular stimulation : WISE CRT System: alternative to conventional methods].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2018 Dec;29(4):340-348. doi: 10.1007/s00399-018-0605-8. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2018. PMID: 30406825 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Proposed strategies to overcome venous occlusion in the implantation of a cardiac implantable electronic device: A case report and literature review.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 24;9:1005596. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1005596. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36352849 Free PMC article.
-
Leadless pacing.Herz. 2018 Nov;43(7):605-611. doi: 10.1007/s00059-018-4752-9. Herz. 2018. PMID: 30255304 Review. English.
-
Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Jul 5;20(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0469-4. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018. PMID: 29973228 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Mar 6;20(3):20. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0614-2. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018. PMID: 29508156 Review.
-
Tricuspid valve incompetence following implantation of ventricular leads.Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2015 Apr;12(2):150-7. doi: 10.1007/s11897-014-0249-x. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2015. PMID: 25488281 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous