A review of the study designs and statistical methods used in the determination of predictors of all-cause mortality in HIV-infected cohorts: 2002-2011
- PMID: 24498313
- PMCID: PMC3911971
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087356
A review of the study designs and statistical methods used in the determination of predictors of all-cause mortality in HIV-infected cohorts: 2002-2011
Abstract
Background: Research in the predictors of all-cause mortality in HIV-infected people has widely been reported in literature. Making an informed decision requires understanding the methods used.
Objectives: We present a review on study designs, statistical methods and their appropriateness in original articles reporting on predictors of all-cause mortality in HIV-infected people between January 2002 and December 2011. Statistical methods were compared between 2002-2006 and 2007-2011. Time-to-event analysis techniques were considered appropriate.
Data sources: Pubmed/Medline.
Study eligibility criteria: Original English-language articles were abstracted. Letters to the editor, editorials, reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, case reports and any other ineligible articles were excluded.
Results: A total of 189 studies were identified (n = 91 in 2002-2006 and n = 98 in 2007-2011) out of which 130 (69%) were prospective and 56 (30%) were retrospective. One hundred and eighty-two (96%) studies described their sample using descriptive statistics while 32 (17%) made comparisons using t-tests. Kaplan-Meier methods for time-to-event analysis were commonly used in the earlier period (n = 69, 76% vs. n = 53, 54%, p = 0.002). Predictors of mortality in the two periods were commonly determined using Cox regression analysis (n = 67, 75% vs. n = 63, 64%, p = 0.12). Only 7 (4%) used advanced survival analysis methods of Cox regression analysis with frailty in which 6 (3%) were used in the later period. Thirty-two (17%) used logistic regression while 8 (4%) used other methods. There were significantly more articles from the first period using appropriate methods compared to the second (n = 80, 88% vs. n = 69, 70%, p-value = 0.003).
Conclusion: Descriptive statistics and survival analysis techniques remain the most common methods of analysis in publications on predictors of all-cause mortality in HIV-infected cohorts while prospective research designs are favoured. Sophisticated techniques of time-dependent Cox regression and Cox regression with frailty are scarce. This motivates for more training in the use of advanced time-to-event methods.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Predictors of mortality among HIV-infected women in Kigali, Rwanda.Ann Intern Med. 1992 Feb 15;116(4):320-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-4-320. Ann Intern Med. 1992. PMID: 1733389
-
Mortality and its predictors among highly active antiretroviral therapy naive hiv-infected individuals: data from prospective cohort study in Ukraine.Georgian Med News. 2014 Jul-Aug;(232-233):69-74. Georgian Med News. 2014. PMID: 25214276
-
Predictors of short- and long-term survival in HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU.Chest. 1998 Feb;113(2):421-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.2.421. Chest. 1998. PMID: 9498962
-
The effect of pregnancy on survival in women infected with HIV: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Aug;105(8):827-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10226.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998. PMID: 9746374
-
Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a rapid review.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013718. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33502003 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Survival prediction models for people living with HIV based on four machine learning models.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16479-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40854952 Free PMC article.
-
Review of the Statistical Methods Used in Original Articles Published in Iranian Journal of Public Health from 2015-2019: A Review Article.Iran J Public Health. 2021 Aug;50(8):1577-1585. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i8.6803. Iran J Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34917528 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Practices in Data Analysis Procedures in Psychology: What Has Changed?Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 13;9:2558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02558. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30618979 Free PMC article.
-
Frequency of the Statistical Methods and Relation with Acceptance Period in Archives of Iranian Medicine Articles: A Review from 2015-2019.Arch Iran Med. 2022 Apr 1;25(4):267-273. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.43. Arch Iran Med. 2022. PMID: 35942999 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research design and statistical methods in Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences (PJMS).Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jan-Feb;32(1):151-4. doi: 10.12669/pjms.321.9033. Pak J Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27022365 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Al-Benna S, Al-Ajam Y, Way B, Steinstraesser L (2010) Descriptive and inferential statistical methods used in burns research. Burns 36: 343–346. - PubMed
-
- Harris AHS, Reeder R, Hyun JK (2009) Common statistical and research design problems in manuscripts submitted to high-impact psychiatry journals: What editors and reviewers want authors to know. Journal of Psychiatric Research 43: 1231–1234. - PubMed
-
- Okeh UM (2008) Statistical problems in medical research. Africa Journal of Biotechnology 7: 4819–4826. - PubMed
-
- Reed JF III, Salen P, Bagher P (2003) Methodological and Statistical Techniques: What do residents really need to know about statistics? Journal of Medical Systems 27: 233–238. - PubMed
-
- Strasak AM, Zaman Q, Marinell G, Pfeiffer PK, Ulmer H (2007) The use of statistics in medical research: A comparison of the New England Journal of Medicine and Nature Medicine. The American Statistician 61: 47–55.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical