Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Mar;123(3):527-535.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000134.

Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested

Yvonne W Cheng et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May;123(5):1109

Abstract

Objective: To examine the length of second stage of labor with and without an epidural during labor.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 42,268 women who delivered vaginally with normal neonatal outcomes. Median lengths and 95th percentiles of second stage of labor were compared by epidural use with stratification by parity. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: Compared with women without epidural use, the 95th percentile length of second stage for nulliparous women was 197 minutes without epidural and 336 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 19 minutes. For multiparous women, the 95th percentile length of second stage was 81 minutes without epidural and 255 minutes with epidural (P<.001), a difference of 2 hours and 54 minutes.

Conclusion: Although recommendations for intervention during the second stage of labor have been made based on a 1-hour difference in the setting of epidural use, it appears that the 95th percentile duration is actually more than 2 hours longer with epidural during labor for both nulliparous and multiparous women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested.
    San Román G. San Román G. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1358-1359. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000314. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24848909 No abstract available.
  • In reply.
    Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Cheng YW, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1359. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000315. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24848910 No abstract available.
  • Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested.
    Hochner-Celnikier D, Solnica A, Lavy Y. Hochner-Celnikier D, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1359-1360. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000316. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24848911 No abstract available.
  • In reply.
    Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Cheng YW, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1360. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000317. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24848912 No abstract available.

References

    1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Division of Vital Statistics. Births: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2012;61:1–29.
    1. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery. Summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1181–94.
    1. Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:29–38.
    1. Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6:567–89.
    1. Friedman EA. Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1956;8:691–703.