Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jul;25(7):883-91.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2301-x. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

Pelvic floor muscle training as an adjunct to prolapse surgery: a randomised feasibility study

Doreen McClurg  1 , Paul Hilton, Lucia Dolan, Ash Monga, Suzanne Hagen, Helena Frawley, Lucy Dickinson
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pelvic floor muscle training as an adjunct to prolapse surgery: a randomised feasibility study

Doreen McClurg et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: There is evidence that in nonsurgical populations, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and lifestyle advice improves symptoms and stage of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Some women, however, require surgery, after which de novo symptoms can develop or additional surgery is required due to recurrence. Robust evidence is required as to the benefit of perioperative PFMT in the postsurgery reduction of symptoms and POP recurrence. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of and collect pilot data to inform sample size (SS) calculation for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of perioperative PFMT following surgical intervention for POP.

Methods: Fifty-seven participants were recruited and randomised to a treatment group (one pre and six postoperative PFMT sessions) or a control group (usual care). The primary outcome measure was the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) at 12 months; secondary outcome measures included measurement of prolapse, the pelvic floor and questionnaires relating to urinary and bowel incontinence. All outcomes were measured at 0, 6 and 12 months.

Results: Information on recruitment, retention and appropriateness of outcome measures for a definitive trial was gathered, and data enabled us to undertake an SS calculation. When compared with the control group (n = 29), benefits to the intervention group (n = 28) were observed in terms of fewer prolapse symptoms at 12 months [mean difference 3.94; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.35-6.75; t = 3.24, p = 0.006]; however, these results must be viewed with caution due to possible selection bias.

Conclusion: With modifications to design identified in this pilot study, a multicentre RCT is feasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abrams PH, Cardoza L, Khoury AE, Wein A. Incontinence, 5th International Consultation on Incontinence. Plymbridge UK: Health Publication Ltd.; 2013.
    1. Slieker-ten M, Pool-Goudzwaard A, Eijkemans M, Steegers-Theunissen R, Burger C, Vierhout M. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J. 2009;20:1037–1045. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0902-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007;369:1027–1038. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60462-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miedel A, Tegerstedt G, Morlin B, Hammarstrom M. A 5-year prospective follow-up study of vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19:1593–1601. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0702-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Gergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–506. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources