Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Feb 5;96(3):244-50.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01652.

Do newer-generation bioabsorbable screws become incorporated into bone at two years after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon graft?: A cohort study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Do newer-generation bioabsorbable screws become incorporated into bone at two years after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon graft?: A cohort study

Charles L Cox et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. .

Abstract

Background: Bioabsorbable interference screws are used frequently for graft fixation in ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction. The resorption properties of many available screws that are marketed as bioabsorbable are not well defined. The CALAXO (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy) and MILAGRO (DePuy Synthes) bioabsorbable screws contain polymers of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) plus additives to encourage osseointegration over time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) properties and compare patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of two years of follow-up after ACL reconstruction using CALAXO or MILAGRO bioabsorbable interference screws.

Methods: A cohort of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction in which the fixation used was either CALAXO or MILAGRO screws returned for repeat radiographs for evaluation of tunnel widening, repeat MRI for evaluation of graft integrity and screw breakdown, and completion of the pain and symptom items of the KOOS (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) questionnaire.

Results: At a mean of three years (range, 2.5 to 4.0 years) after surgery, thirty-one patients with sixty-two CALAXO screws and thirty-six patients with seventy-two MILAGRO screws returned for repeat evaluation. Two blinded, independent reviewers found no significant differences between the two screw types when comparing radiographs for tibial or femoral tunnel widening or MRIs for graft integrity, tibial and femoral foreign body reactions, or femoral screw degradation. Both reviewers found a significant difference between the two screw types when comparing tibial screw degradation properties (p < 0.01). All analyzed CALAXO screws were rated as partially intact or degraded; the MILAGRO screws were more likely to be rated as intact. No significant differences were noted between the two screw types when comparing the two KOOS subscales.

Conclusions: CALAXO screws in the tibial tunnel were more likely to be rated as degraded or partially degraded compared with MILAGRO screws at a mean of three years after implantation for ACL reconstruction. Although these newer-generation bioabsorbable screws were designed to promote osseointegration, no tunnel narrowing was noted, and in the majority of cases the remains of the screws were present at approximately three years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Representative sagittal proton-density-weighted MRI scans without fat saturation demonstrating intact, partially degraded, and degraded screws (arrows) of each type. The upper panels show CALAXO screws and the lower panels show MILAGRO screws. There were no CALAXO screws rated as intact.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative axial proton-density-weighted MRI scans with spatially selective fat saturation (SPIR) demonstrating no reaction, edema, and cyst formation within the tunnel in response to each type of screw. The arrows point to the reactions (or to the screws in the images without reaction). The upper panels show CALAXO screws and the lower panels show MILAGRO screws.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative standing anteroposterior (AP) and non-weight-bearing lateral radiographs are shown for each type of screw. The upper panels show CALAXO screws and the lower panels show MILAGRO screws.

References

    1. Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Tegnander A. Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts fixed with bioabsorbable or metal interference screws: a prospective randomized study of the clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1160-5 Epub 2005 Jul 06 - PubMed
    1. Kaeding C, Farr J, Kavanaugh T, Pedroza A. A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws. Arthroscopy. 2005 Feb;21(2):147-51 - PubMed
    1. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Eriksson BI, Faxén E, Sernert N, Karlsson J. Biodegradable and metallic interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery using hamstring tendon grafts: prospective randomized study of radiographic results and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1574-80 Epub 2006 May 09 - PubMed
    1. Ma CB, Francis K, Towers J, Irrgang J, Fu FH, Harner CH. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy. 2004 Feb;20(2):122-8 - PubMed
    1. Böstman OM, Laitinen OM, Tynninen O, Salminen ST, Pihlajamäki HK. Tissue restoration after resorption of polyglycolide and poly-laevo-lactic acid screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Nov;87(11):1575-80 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms