Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;10(1):1-3.
doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.124448.

Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: mesh, no mesh or a ventral mesh?

Deepraj S Bhandarkar  1
Affiliations

Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: mesh, no mesh or a ventral mesh?

Deepraj S Bhandarkar. J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schiedeck TH, Schwandner O, Scheele J, Farke S, Bruch HP. Rectal prolapse: Which surgical option is appropriate? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:8–14. - PubMed
    1. Madiba T, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg. 2005;140:63–73. - PubMed
    1. Mathew MJ, Parmar AK, Reddy PK. Mesh erosion after laparoscopic posterior rectopexy: A rare complication. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10:40–1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Athanasiadis S, Weyand G, Heiligers J, Heumuller L, Barthelmes L. The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11:42–4. - PubMed
    1. Sahoo MR, Anil Kumar T, Gowda MS. A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh and rectopexy versus suture rectopexy. J Minim Access Surg. 2014;10:18–22. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources