Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Dec 1;4(4):395-405.
eCollection 2005 Dec.

Tolerance and conditioning to neuro-muscular electrical stimulation within and between sessions and gender

Affiliations

Tolerance and conditioning to neuro-muscular electrical stimulation within and between sessions and gender

Gad Alon et al. J Sports Sci Med. .

Abstract

1) If healthy subjects can be conditioned to tolerate clinically useful electrically induced muscle contraction; and 2) If there is a gender difference in response to such conditioning. Healthy volunteers (10 males, 11 females, mean age of 27.6 ± 5.8 yrs) were tested during each of 6 testing sessions. Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) of the right quadriceps femoris (RQF) recorded by a computerized dynamometer. Electrical stimulation delivered through two surface electrodes and stimulation amplitude increased until the subject indicated to stop. After a 1 min rest the amplitude increased again to the same phase charge level, and the electrically induced contraction (EIC) was recorded by the dynamometer. Measurements of stimulation amplitude were repeated in each of 10 stimulation bouts per session. Measurements of EIC were repeated in session six. Statistical analyses included Multivariate ANOVAs, and Newman-Kuel's post-hoc tests (p < 0.01). Mean values of phase charge increased from session 1 to 6 for all subjects. Males tolerated significantly higher phase charge. The mean %MVIC torque generated by female subjects was initially only 11.2 ± 21.6% but reached 42.9 ± 25.4% at the end of the 6th session. Males' %MVIC torque values were significantly higher reaching 49.0 ± 41.6% and 73.5 ± 18.7% in the first and last trials respectively. Using the criterion that electrically induced contractions must be at least 25% of MVIC to be considered clinically useful, 36% of females were below this threshold at the end of the last session. In contrast, all males exceeded the 25% MVIC threshold at the end of the study. Most healthy subjects can be conditioned to electrical stimulation of the quadriceps, but depending on the criteria of therapeutic value and gender, some males and even more females may not reach the desired stimulation goal in 6 sessions. Females may require more conditioning sessions to reach contraction levels of therapeutic benefits. The reason(s) for the confounding factor of gender remains unknown. Key PointsNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can strengthen skeletal musclesTolerance to NMES improves within 6 sessionsConditioning is a key to eliciting stronger contraction and to increasing the number of subjects that can benefit from NMESHealthy males can tolerate higher stimulusintensity and higher electrically induced quadriceps femoris contraction.

Keywords: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; conditioning; gender; tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Electrodes position and method of securing them over the quadriceps.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Illustration of MVIC and EIC determination. An interval of the highest magnitude on the torque-time curve was visually determined. The MVIC peak torque was calculated as the average of 10 values collected at 0.1 sec intervals within the 1 sec interval. EIC was likewise calculated and further presented as percent MVIC using the formula EIC/MVICx100.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Means and standard deviations of the electrically induced contraction (EIC) as percent of MVIC at the beginning and end of sessions 1 and 6. Empty bars = females, Filled bars = males, S = Session, B = Bout.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Means and standard deviations of the amount of phase charge at the beginning and end of sessions 1 and 6. Empty bars = females, Filled bars = males, S = Session, B = Bout.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
The fluctuating yet upward increase tolerance to stimulus intensity within and between sessions. Filled circle = males, Empty circle = females, S = Session, B = Bout.

References

    1. Alon G., Dar A., Katz-Behiri D. (1998) Efficacy of a hybrid upper limb neuromuscular electrical stimulation system in lessenning selected impairments and dysfunctions consequent to cerebral damage. Journal of Neurological Rehabiitation 12, 73-80
    1. Alon G., Frederickson R., Gallager L., Rehwoldt C.T., Guillen M., Pement M.L., Barnhart J.B. (1992) Electrical stimulation of the abdominals: The effects of three versus five weekly treatments. Journal Clinical Electrophysiology 4, 5-11
    1. Alon G., Kantor G, Smith G.V.(1999) Peripheral nerve excitation and plantar flexion force elicited by electrical stimulation in males and females. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy 29, 208-214;discussion 215-217. - PubMed
    1. Alon G., Sunnerhagen K.S., Geurts A.C., Ohry A. (2003) A home-based, self-administered stimulation program to improve selected hand functions of chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 18, 215-225 - PubMed
    1. Alon G., Taylor D.J. (1997) Electrically elicited minimal visible tetanic contraction and its effect on abdominal muscles strength and endurance. European Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 7, 2-6

LinkOut - more resources