Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Feb;106(2):djt431.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt431.

Aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and acetaminophen use and risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and acetaminophen use and risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Britton Trabert et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Regular aspirin use is associated with reduced risk of several malignancies. Epidemiologic studies analyzing aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and acetaminophen use and ovarian cancer risk have been inconclusive.

Methods: We analyzed pooled data from 12 population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer, including 7776 case patients and 11843 control subjects accrued between 1992 and 2007. Odds ratios (ORs) for associations of medication use with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer were estimated in individual studies using logistic regression and combined using random effects meta-analysis. Associations between frequency, dose, and duration of analgesic use and risk of ovarian cancer were also assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84 to 0.99). Results were similar but not statistically significant for nonaspirin NSAIDs, and there was no association with acetaminophen. In seven studies with frequency data, the reduced risk was strongest among daily aspirin users (OR = 0.80; 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.96). In three studies with dose information, the reduced risk was strongest among users of low dose (<100 mg) aspirin (OR = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.83), whereas for nonaspirin NSAIDs, the reduced risk was strongest for high dose (≥500 mg) usage (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.64 to 0.91).

Conclusions: Aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer, especially among daily users of low-dose aspirin. These findings suggest that the same aspirin regimen proven to protect against cardiovascular events and several cancers could reduce the risk of ovarian cancer 20% to 34% depending on frequency and dose of use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between regular (at least once per week) use of aspirin (A), nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (B), and acetaminophen (C) and ovarian cancer risk. Summary odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a random-effect meta-analytic model. All statistical tests were two-sided. I 2 is the percentage of variation across studies due to heterogeneity rather than chance. % Weight describes the weight (inverse variance) each study contributed to the summary odds ratio, and the size of the surrounding square is an illustrative representation of study weighting. The horizontal lines represent study-specific confidence intervals; if ending in an arrow, this indicates that the interval transcends the region plotted. The diamond represents the summary odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. Studies are presented in order of median year of case accrual from earliest to most recent. AUS = Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Australian Cancer Study; CON = Connecticut Ovary Study; DOV = Diseases of the Ovary and their Evaluation Study; HAW = Hawaii Ovarian Cancer Study; HOP = Hormones and Ovarian Cancer Prediction Study; MAL = Malignant Ovarian Cancer Study; NCO = North Carolina Ovarian Cancer Study; NEC = New England Case–Control Study of Ovarian Cancer; NJO = New Jersey Ovarian Cancer Study; UCI = University of California, Irvine Ovarian Cancer Study; UKO = United Kingdom Ovarian Cancer Population Study; USC = University of Southern California Study of Lifestyle and Women’s Health.

Comment in

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90 - PubMed
    1. Buys SS, Partridge E, Greene MH, et al. Ovarian cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screen of a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1630–1639 - PubMed
    1. Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A, et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2011;305(22):2295–2303 - PubMed
    1. Zhu CS, Pinsky PF, Cramer DW, et al. A framework for evaluating biomarkers for early detection: validation of biomarker panels for ovarian cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(3):375–383 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cramer DW, Bast RC, Jr., Berg CD, et al. Ovarian cancer biomarker performance in prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial specimens. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(3):365–374 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms