2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison
- PMID: 24507934
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.028
2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison
Abstract
Symmetry is a significant factor, among others, influencing the attractiveness of human faces. Hence its restoration is an essential task in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Until recently, most of the techniques to objectively quantify the facial asymmetry were based on the evaluation of two-dimensional data, i.e. photographs. These techniques are well-established in literature and have in common that several landmarks in the face are identified manually and put together in a formula to obtain a facial asymmetry value. The increasing availability of three-dimensional measuring systems offers the possibility to perform an automated 3D analysis of the facial symmetry based on a dense 3D point cloud of the facial surface. The results of this analysis are on the one hand a mirror plane, which meets best the partial symmetry of the face regarding the median sagittal plane, and on the other hand a 3D asymmetry index quantifying the overall facial asymmetry characteristics. In this paper three selected 2D analysis methods and one 3D analysis method are compared.
Keywords: 2D analysis; 3D analysis; 3D point cloud; Facial asymmetry; Optical topometric sensor.
Copyright © 2014 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Quantification of facial asymmetry by 2D analysis - A comparison of recent approaches.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Apr;42(3):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.07.033. Epub 2013 Sep 14. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24041610 Review.
-
Three dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry after mandibular reconstruction: validation of a new method using stereophotogrammetry.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;42(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.05.036. Epub 2012 Aug 30. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013. PMID: 22939875
-
Facial asymmetry index in normal young adults.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 May;16(2):97-104. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12010. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013. PMID: 23324075
-
[Advances in determination of median sagittal plane of facial soft tissue].Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 9;53(7):495-499. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2018.07.015. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29996372 Chinese.
-
[Quantification of Facial Asymmetry : A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Applications].Orthod Fr. 2025 Jan 22;95(4):347-353. doi: 10.1684/orthodfr.2024.170. Orthod Fr. 2025. PMID: 39840736 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery.Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 11;10(1):2346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58682-4. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32047228 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Facial Asymmetry.Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015 Apr;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2015.16.1.1. Epub 2015 Apr 10. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015. PMID: 28913211 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional simulated images among the orthodontists and laypersons: a cross-sectional study.BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03167-9. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37468873 Free PMC article.
-
Palatal asymmetry assessed by intraoral scans: effects of sex, orthodontic treatment, and twinning. A retrospective cohort study.BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 18;23(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02993-1. BMC Oral Health. 2023. PMID: 37202781 Free PMC article.
-
The accuracy of anatomic landmarks on the occlusal plane: a comparative study between conventional and 3D image method.BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):1459. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05132-6. BMC Oral Health. 2024. PMID: 39623366 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources