Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;28(2):392-7.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

Blood pressure variability: can nonlinear dynamics enhance risk assessment during cardiovascular surgery?

Affiliations

Blood pressure variability: can nonlinear dynamics enhance risk assessment during cardiovascular surgery?

Balachundhar Subramaniam et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

We propose that complex (nonlinear) fluctuations of hemodynamic variables (including systemic blood pressure parameters) during cardiovascular surgery contain information relevant to risk assessment and intraoperative management. Preliminary analysis of a pilot study supports the feasibility and potential merits of performing a larger, prospective study to assess the clinical utility of such new dynamical measures and to evaluate their potential role in enhancing contemporary approaches to risk assessment of major adverse events.

Keywords: beat by beat.; blood pressure; blood pressure variability; cardiac surgery; dynamic biomarkers; instability; multiscale entropy; nonlinear analysis; outcomes; perioperative; risk index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systolic, diastolic, pulse pressure and heart rate fluctuation time series from a control subject. Note: the heart rate time series were not analyzed because most patients had sustained electronic pacing that confounds heart rate variability analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis of the detrended pulse pressure time series from the post-bypass period for the case and control groups. Symbols and error bars represent group means and standard deviation values.

References

    1. Glance LG, Osler TM, Mukamel DB, et al. Effect of complications on mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: evidence from New York State. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:53–58. - PubMed
    1. Song HK, Diggs BS, Slater MS, et al. Improved quality and cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting in the United States from 1988 to 2005. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:65–69. - PubMed
    1. Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, et al. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score. JAMA. 1992;267:2344–2348. - PubMed
    1. Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:S2–S22. - PubMed
    1. Asimakopoulos G, Al-Ruzzeh S, Ambler G, et al. An evaluation of existing risk stratification models as a tool for comparison of surgical performances for coronary artery bypass grafting between institutions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:935–941. - PubMed

MeSH terms