Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity
- PMID: 24509712
- DOI: 10.1038/nature12976
Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity
Abstract
The reorganization of patterns of species diversity driven by anthropogenic climate change, and the consequences for humans, are not yet fully understood or appreciated. Nevertheless, changes in climate conditions are useful for predicting shifts in species distributions at global and local scales. Here we use the velocity of climate change to derive spatial trajectories for climatic niches from 1960 to 2009 (ref. 7) and from 2006 to 2100, and use the properties of these trajectories to infer changes in species distributions. Coastlines act as barriers and locally cooler areas act as attractors for trajectories, creating source and sink areas for local climatic conditions. Climate source areas indicate where locally novel conditions are not connected to areas where similar climates previously occurred, and are thereby inaccessible to climate migrants tracking isotherms: 16% of global surface area for 1960 to 2009, and 34% of ocean for the 'business as usual' climate scenario (representative concentration pathway (RCP) 8.5) representing continued use of fossil fuels without mitigation. Climate sink areas are where climate conditions locally disappear, potentially blocking the movement of climate migrants. Sink areas comprise 1.0% of ocean area and 3.6% of land and are prevalent on coasts and high ground. Using this approach to infer shifts in species distributions gives global and regional maps of the expected direction and rate of shifts of climate migrants, and suggests areas of potential loss of species richness.
Similar articles
-
Are fish outside their usual ranges early indicators of climate-driven range shifts?Glob Chang Biol. 2017 May;23(5):2047-2057. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13635. Epub 2017 Feb 23. Glob Chang Biol. 2017. PMID: 28122146
-
Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks.PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173443. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173443. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28301488 Free PMC article.
-
Biotic and Climatic Velocity Identify Contrasting Areas of Vulnerability to Climate Change.PLoS One. 2015 Oct 14;10(10):e0140486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140486. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26466364 Free PMC article.
-
The integration of climate change, spatial dynamics, and habitat fragmentation: A conceptual overview.Integr Zool. 2016 Jan;11(1):40-59. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12167. Integr Zool. 2016. PMID: 26458303 Review.
-
How will biotic interactions influence climate change-induced range shifts?Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Sep;1297:112-25. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12182. Epub 2013 Jul 22. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013. PMID: 23876073 Review.
Cited by
-
Spatially heterogeneous impact of climate change on small mammals of montane California.Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 22;282(1799):20141857. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1857. Proc Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 25621330 Free PMC article.
-
Fine-grained climate velocities reveal vulnerability of protected areas to climate change.Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):1678. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58638-8. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32015382 Free PMC article.
-
Edging along a Warming Coast: A Range Extension for a Common Sandy Beach Crab.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 2;10(11):e0141976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141976. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26524471 Free PMC article.
-
Plant adaptation to climate change - Where are we?J Syst Evol. 2020 Sep;58(5):533-545. doi: 10.1111/jse.12649. Epub 2020 Jun 18. J Syst Evol. 2020. PMID: 33584833 Free PMC article.
-
Native biodiversity collapse in the eastern Mediterranean.Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 13;288(1942):20202469. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2469. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Proc Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33402072 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical