Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;191(4):1090-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.077. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty

Briony K Varda  1 , Emilie K Johnson  2 , Curtis Clark  3 , Benjamin I Chung  4 , Caleb P Nelson  2 , Steven L Chang  5
Affiliations

National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty

Briony K Varda et al. J Urol. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: We performed a population based study comparing trends in perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty. Specific billing items contributing to cost were also investigated.

Materials and methods: Using the Perspective database (Premier, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina), we identified 12,662 pediatric patients who underwent open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty (ICD-9 55.87) in the United States from 2003 to 2010. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to evaluate perioperative outcomes, complications and costs for the competing surgical approaches. Propensity weighting was used to minimize selection bias. Sampling weights were used to yield a nationally representative sample.

Results: A decrease in open pyeloplasty and an increase in minimally invasive pyeloplasty were observed. All procedures had low complication rates. Compared to open pyeloplasty, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty had longer median operative times (240 minutes, p <0.0001 and 270 minutes, p <0.0001, respectively). There was no difference in median length of stay. Median total cost was lower among patients undergoing open vs robotic pyeloplasty ($7,221 vs $10,780, p <0.001). This cost difference was largely attributable to robotic supply costs.

Conclusions: During the study period open pyeloplasty made up a declining majority of cases. Use of laparoscopic pyeloplasty plateaued, while robotic pyeloplasty increased. Operative time was longer for minimally invasive pyeloplasty, while length of stay was equivalent across all procedures. A higher cost associated with robotic pyeloplasty was driven by operating room use and robotic equipment costs, which nullified low room and board cost. This study reflects an adoption period for robotic pyeloplasty. With time, perioperative outcomes and cost may improve.

Keywords: kidney pelvis; laparoscopy; minimally invasive; robotics; surgical procedures; ureteral obstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • Editorial comment.
    Cisek LJ. Cisek LJ. J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):1096. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.151. Epub 2014 Jan 1. J Urol. 2014. PMID: 24388725 No abstract available.

References

    1. Traxel EJ, Minevich EA, Noh PH. A Review: The Application of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Pediatric Urology: Upper Urinary Tract Procedures. Urology. 2010;76:122–133. - PubMed
    1. Rowe CK, Pierce MW, Tecci KC, et al. A Comparative Direct Cost Analysis of Pediatric Urologic Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery: Could Robot-Assisted Surgery Be Less Expensive? J Endourol. 2012;26:871–877. - PubMed
    1. O’Brien ST, Shukla AR. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: A feasibility and outcome study. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8:276–281. - PubMed
    1. Sorensen MD, Delostrinos C, Johnson MH, et al. Comparison of the Learning Curve and Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Pediatric Pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2011;185:2517–2522. - PubMed
    1. Tanaka ST, Grantham JA, Thomas JC, et al. A Comparison of Open vs Laparoscopic Pediatric Pyeloplasty Using the Pediatric Health Information System Database—Do Benefits of Laparoscopic Approach Recede at Younger Ages? J Urol. 2008;180:1479–1485. - PubMed