Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial
- PMID: 24513442
- PMCID: PMC3919179
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g1285
Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of antenatal dietary and lifestyle interventions on health outcomes in overweight and obese pregnant women.
Design: Multicentre randomised trial. We utilised a central telephone randomisation server, with computer generated schedule, balanced variable blocks, and stratification for parity, body mass index (BMI) category, and hospital.
Setting: Three public maternity hospitals across South Australia.
Participants: 2212 women with a singleton pregnancy, between 10+0 and 20+0 weeks' gestation, and BMI ≥ 25.
Interventions: 1108 women were randomised to a comprehensive dietary and lifestyle intervention delivered by research staff; 1104 were randomised to standard care and received pregnancy care according to local guidelines, which did not include such information.
Main outcome measures: Incidence of infants born large for gestational age (birth weight ≥ 90th centile for gestation and sex). Prespecified secondary outcomes included birth weight >4000 g, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes. Analyses used intention to treat principles.
Results: 2152 women and 2142 liveborn infants were included in the analyses. The risk of the infant being large for gestational age was not significantly different in the two groups (lifestyle advice 203/1075 (19%) v standard care 224/1067 (21%); adjusted relative risk 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.07; P=0.24). Infants born to women after lifestyle advice were significantly less likely to have birth weight above 4000 g (lifestyle advice 164/1075 (15%) v standard care 201/1067 (19%); 0.82, 0.68 to 0.99; number needed to treat (NNT) 28, 15 to 263; P=0.04). There were no differences in maternal pregnancy and birth outcomes between the two treatment groups.
Conclusions: For women who were overweight or obese, the antenatal lifestyle advice used in this study did not reduce the risk delivering a baby weighing above the 90th centile for gestational age and sex or improve maternal pregnancy and birth outcomes.
Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12607000161426).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Comment in
-
Healthy eating in pregnancy.BMJ. 2014 Mar 4;348:g1739. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1739. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24598079 No abstract available.
-
Lifestyle interventions in obese and overweight pregnant women do not reduce the risk of large-for-gestational age babies.Evid Based Med. 2014 Oct;19(5):187. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-110007. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Evid Based Med. 2014. PMID: 25228709 No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:1-253. - PubMed
-
- Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ, for the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002;360:1347-60. - PubMed
-
- Scheil, W, Scott J, Catcheside B, Sage L. Pregnancy outcome in South Australia 2010. Pregnancy Outcome Unit SA Health, Government of South Australia, Adelaide, 2012.
-
- Chu SY, Kim SY, Bish CL. Prepregnancy obesity prevalence in the United States, 2004-2005. Maternal Child Health J 2008;13:614-20. - PubMed
-
- Callaway LK, Prins JB, Chang AM, McIntyre HD. The prevalence and impact of overweight and obesity in an Australian obstetric population. Med J Aust 2006;184:56-9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical