Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb;17(2):219-35.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0409.

Evidence-based palliative care in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of interventions

Affiliations

Evidence-based palliative care in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of interventions

Rebecca Aslakson et al. J Palliat Med. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Over the last 20 years, multiple interventions to better integrate palliative care and intensive care unit (ICU) care have been evaluated. This systematic review summarizes these studies and their outcomes.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science; performed a search of articles published by opinion leaders in the field; and reviewed hand-search articles as of August 13, 2012. The terms "palliative care" and "intensive care unit" were mapped to MeSH subject headings and "exploded." We included trials of adult patients that evaluated an ICU intervention and addressed Robert Wood Johnson group-identified domains of high-quality end-of-life care in the ICU. We excluded case series, editorials, and review articles. We compared two types of interventions, integrative and consultative, focusing on the outcomes of patient and family satisfaction, mortality, and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), because these were most prevalent among studies.

Results: Our search strategy yielded 3328 references, of which we included 37 publications detailing 30 unique interventions. Interventions and outcome measures were heterogeneous, and many studies were underpowered and/or subject to multiple biases. Most of the interventions resulted in a decrease in hospital and ICU LOS. Few interventions significantly affected satisfaction. With one exception, the interventions decreased or had no effect on mortality. There was no evidence of harm from any intervention.

Conclusions: Heterogeneity of interventions made comparison of ICU-based palliative care interventions difficult. However, existing evidence suggests proactive palliative care in the ICU, using either consultative or integrative palliative care interventions, decrease hospital and ICU LOS, do not affect satisfaction, and either decrease or do not affect mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Flow diagram of search strategy.

References

    1. Angus DC, Barnato AE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Weissfeld LA, Watson RS, Rickert T, Rubenfeld GD; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ICU End-of-Life Peer Group: Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study. Crit Care Med 2004;32:638–643 - PubMed
    1. Teno JM, Gozalo PL, Bynum JP, Leland NE, Miller SC, Morden NE, Scupp T, Goodman DC, Mor V: Change in end-of-life care for Medicare beneficiaries: Site of death, place of care, and health care transitions in 2000, 2005, and 2009. JAMA 2013;309:470–477 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puntillo KA, Arai S, Cohen NH, Gropper MA, Nauhaus J, Paul SM, Miaskowski C: Symptoms experienced by intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying. Crit Care Med 2010;38:2155–2160 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson JE, Meier DE, Litke A, Natale DA, Siegel RE, Morrison RS: The symptom burden of chronic critical illness. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1527–1534 - PubMed
    1. Nelson JE, Puntillo KA, Pronovost PJ, Walker AS, McAdam JL, Ilaoa D, Penrod J: In their own words: Patients and families define high-quality palliative care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2010;38:808–818 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types