Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;22(4):756-62.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2886-8. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Surgical management of labral tears during femoroacetabular impingement surgery: a systematic review

Affiliations

Surgical management of labral tears during femoroacetabular impingement surgery: a systematic review

O R Ayeni et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review explored reported outcomes addressing femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), specifically those comparing labral debridement to labral repair. In addition, the quality of the evidence was evaluated for the purposes of making treatment recommendations.

Methods: Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) were searched for comparative studies involving labral repair and debridement during FAI surgery. Two reviewers conducted a title, abstract, and full-text review of eligible studies and the references of these studies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the searched studies, data were extracted, and a quality assessment was completed for included studies.

Results: Six eligible studies involving 490 patients were identified. The most commonly reported outcome measure was the modified Harris hip score (MHHS) (50 %). All studies reported that labral repair had greater postoperative improvements in functional scores (modified Harris hip, non-arthritic hip, hip outcome, and Merle d'Aubigne scores) compared to labral debridement. Five studies reported statistically significant improvements with labral repair. MHHS were pooled to demonstrate a clinically important difference in favor of labral repair by 7.4 points in three studies. The mean individual study quality can be considered fair. However, the overall quality of the body of evidence in this review is rated as low according to GRADE guidelines.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates a reporting of better clinical outcomes with labral repair compared to labral debridement in all studies with five of six studies reporting statistically significant improvements (of repair over debridement). However, given the lack of high quality evidence and associated limitations in study design, these results should be interpreted with caution. Consequently, definitive treatment recommendations require further investigation with well-conducted clinical trials. This systematic review enables the discussion of best evidence practice for the surgical managing of a labral tear associated with FAI.

Level of evidence: III.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):747-52 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar;89 Suppl 2 Pt.1:36-53 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):46-53 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):16-23 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 15;94(4):e23 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources