Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;94(1):23-30.
doi: 10.1111/ejh.12284.

Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the management of Burkitt lymphoma

Affiliations

Role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the management of Burkitt lymphoma

Estrella Carrillo-Cruz et al. Eur J Haematol. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is highly FDG-avid even though its usefulness in the management of these patients is still controversial.

Aim: We analyzed the role of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) in staging newly diagnosed patients with BL and evaluating disease after first-line chemotherapy.

Methods: Fifty-two PET/CTs were performed in 32 patients (20 at diagnosis, 27 after treatment, five to monitor residual disease). Involved areas were retrospectively compared with those observed in contrast-enhanced CT.

Results: Discrepancies were found in 64.7% of patients for whom results of both tests at diagnosis were available (n = 17), most of them involving extranodal sites. Regarding response assessment, discrepancies were observed in 38% of patients with both tests (5/13): residual masses detected by CT with negative PET/CT. Of 27 patients with post-treatment PET/CT, 22 were in complete remission whereas one true-positive and four false-positive lesions (two nodal and two extranodal) were detected. With a median follow-up of 27 months, 22 patients with negative PET/CT did not relapse. Thus, negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%. With respect to positive predictive value (PPV), one of five patients with positive assays after treatment died due to progression while the remaining four had false-positive lesions. Nevertheless, for these four patients, mean SUVmax at nodal sites was 4.1 vs. 14.9 at diagnosis, while mean SUVmax at extranodal sites was 3.8 vs. 12.1. Thus, with a cutoff value for SUVmax < 66% of that observed at diagnosis, PPV was also 100%.

Conclusion: More accurate staging can be achieved using PET/CT. NPV reaches 100%, and using a ΔSUV < 66%, a high PPV is also observed.

Keywords: Burkitt lymphoma; [18F]-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography; positron emission tomography/computerized tomography; response assessment; staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Substances