Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 11;15(2):2454-64.
doi: 10.3390/ijms15022454.

Evaluation of osseointegration of titanium alloyed implants modified by plasma polymerization

Affiliations

Evaluation of osseointegration of titanium alloyed implants modified by plasma polymerization

Carolin Gabler et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

By means of plasma polymerization, positively charged, nanometre-thin coatings can be applied to implant surfaces. The aim of the present study was to quantify the adhesion of human bone cells in vitro and to evaluate the bone ongrowth in vivo, on titanium surfaces modified by plasma polymer coatings. Different implant surface configurations were examined: titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) coated with plasma-polymerized allylamine (PPAAm) and plasma-polymerized ethylenediamine (PPEDA) versus uncoated. Shear stress on human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells was investigated in vitro using a spinning disc device. Furthermore, bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was evaluated in vivo. Custom-made conical titanium implants were inserted at the medial tibia of female Sprague-Dawley rats. After a follow-up of six weeks, the BIC was determined by means of histomorphometry. The quantification of cell adhesion showed a significantly higher shear stress for MG-63 cells on PPAAm and PPEDA compared to uncoated Ti6Al4V. Uncoated titanium alloyed implants showed the lowest BIC (40.4%). Implants with PPAAm coating revealed a clear but not significant increase of the BIC (58.5%) and implants with PPEDA a significantly increased BIC (63.7%). In conclusion, plasma polymer coatings demonstrate enhanced cell adhesion and bone ongrowth compared to uncoated titanium surfaces.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Shear stress (N/m2) exerted on MG-63 cells deployed on different implant surface configurations (uncoated, PPAAm-coated and PPEDA-coated titanium discs). Shear stress on plasma polymer coatings was significantly higher compared to uncoated Ti6Al4V (* p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.001).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) (%) of the implants with different titanium implant surface configurations (uncoated, PPAAm-coated and PPEDA-coated) after six weeks in vivo. BIC was increased by plasma polymer coatings (* p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) Implant for insertion in the tibial metaphysis of the Sprague-Dawley rats; (b) Retrieved tibial bone with an implant in the medial metaphysis.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Histomorphometric sample with a PPAAm-coated implant in the proximal rat tibia (toluidine blue staining). Green line marks the evaluated implant region for BIC.

References

    1. Jones C.A., Beaupre L.A., Johnston D.W.C., Suarez-Almazor M.E. Total joint arthroplasties: Current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2007;33:71–86. - PubMed
    1. Goodman S.B. Wear particles, periprosthetic osteolysis and the immune system. Biomaterials. 2007;28:5044–5048. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer T.W., Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. Skelet. Radiol. 1999;28:483–497. - PubMed
    1. Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Watson H., Schmier J.K., Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J. Arthroplast. 2012;27 doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21:667–681. - PubMed

Publication types